For. Nommed for VFH a few years ago and failed, but we're violently short on articles so it's going up again. --Talk!Contribs! 09:24, September 4, 2011 (UTC)
For. Nice! ShabiDOO 00:14, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Yes because because because it is good.Mnidtalk 01:16, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
For - Well, the other articles on VFH have heart, but A Man Getting Hit in the Crotch 800 Times has a man getting hit in the crotch 800 times. --Kip > Talk•Works•• 03:12, Sep. 5, 2011
For. Kip put it better than I ever could have. -RAHB 04:38, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
For Feature worthy as-is but would be even better if someone could chop up a movie poster for it.-- 12:50, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Written two years after Idiocracy came out, this strikes me as unacceptably derivative. pillow talk 08:00, September 6, 2011 (UTC)
I have no idea what that other guy is talking about, but I feel like Iǘe seen this before, and done better. Just... all the bits. Various places. And they don't really come together that well. 1234~19:36, 7 September 2011
Against. Funnybony 07:58, Sep 11 07:58, September 11, 2011 (UTC)
Comments
Comment. I think the article could refer back to something really out there (e.g. Jackass or Balls of Steel, Wipeout etc) to make it seem more faux-real. Just seems to be in its own universe here in my view. Also lacks wood jokes. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:09, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Comment. Writing is good but the article needs more illustrations. Total missed opportunity on the soccer (Oh excuse me, football) picture. Should read "A screenshot from the British version of the film, called "Some bloke getting a cracking smack to the goolies 600 times" or something else loaded with British slang. It's kind of like someone who's WAY too American attempting to make British humor (Irony alert) -- 11:58, September 5, 2011 (UTC)
Featured. 1234~00:14, 14 September 2011 This article has passed VFH and was featured on 14 September 2011. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.