Weak For. While the photos of the cute girl kept me interested int he article it is well written enough despite lack of me actually laughing. Dr. Fenwick 18:38, January 22, 2011 (UTC)
I'm still not seeing it, sorry. Her hair looks fairly ordinary to me. 1234~21:38, 22 January 2011
That'll do pig, that'll do. --BlackFlamingo 20:47, January 24, 2011 (UTC)
For. awsome Shabidoo 02:15, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Against. Not featuring this article by Big;)--Sycamore(Talk) 13:40, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Against: 0
No against votes
Comments
Damn, this is picking up votes faster than a hooker in the Vatican. It looks like it will challenge my three-day in-a-row feature HowTo:Go into the light. Four days, I swear to God I would have been satisfied with four days! Aleister 11:11 21 1 '11
Never mind, it got its four days! In a perfect world it would have gotten "one for the thumb", but perfection only exists in "Kill Bill I and II". Aleister 12:31 22-1-'11
Abstain. I read this a few times but couldn't go for it. Sorry. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 00:03, January 23, 2011 (UTC)
Featured. ~ 20:15, January 28, 2011 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on Error: invalid time. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article. Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
pillow talk 01:34, January 21, 2011 (UTC)
For. I've waited my whole life for this to show up here, or at least a big part of it. Ginger. Oh, and well written too. 
20:15, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
