Uncyclopedia:VFH/AIDS (Space Program) (Rewrite)

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

AIDS (Space Program) (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: AIDS (Space Program)	Score: -3 epidemics of extraterrestrial discovery
Nominated by:	IronLung 21:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
For: 5	For. This failed in the past, then Gerrycheevers rewrote it. IronLung 21:42, 25 April 2009 (UTC) For. Another excellent rewrite. --Dame 22:17, 25 April 2009 (UTC) For. The AIDS astronaut was positive that they'd reach the moon within six months. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:59, 25 April 2009 (UTC) Well, fine. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 10:17, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Ok—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 01:37, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Yes! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:21, 26 April 2009 (UTC) I'm building a bridge to the Mars! |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Kemador CUN|IC Kill | 05:09, 26 April 2009 (UTC) For. Nice article. Zeitgeist 13:28, 26 April 2009 (UTC) For. Good rewrite. =) Saberwolf116 14:54, 26 April 2009 (UTC) Bless. testing my new template.. Yay! It worked! 18:06, 27 April 2009 (UTC) For featuring before Gerry is done. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 20:24, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Against: 8	self against. i can't say this is finished enough for me to want to see it on the front page yet, either. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 00:36, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Well, I came here to vote for, but if the author wants more time to work on it, obviously we should give it to him. pillow talk 06:05, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Perfunctory Against based on authorial preference. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 07:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Against for now, as per Gerry's wishes. --Dame 09:31, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Alright, if you want more time, be my guest. Saberwolf116 12:19, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Darn it, Gerry! Get moving! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:29, Apr 27 Fine. I'll vote against. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 23:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC) Well, I checked the history and saw that it hadn't been worked on for a week, it looked good... shit. I'll ask next time. IronLung 01:56, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. I can see it is a far better replacement for the vile rubbish that was there earlier but can't vote for or against it. Perhaps I am a mite sensitive with issues like this that always teeter on borderline issues like this one. --Romartus 10:33, 26 April 2009 (UTC) i appreciate it guys, it'll be back on here soon, i promise. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:09, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

VFH

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH