Nom and for. By Pup. Mattsnow 01:17, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
For. I don't think it's fantastic feature material, but what the hell; it made me laugh.--Snippy 06:22, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
Ugh. Though I still think a critical analysis of said 50 shades of grey by the internet's leading colorologist would make for a nice article too. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:58, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
Good point. I've moved it to Fifty shades of grey as I hate having caps in titles, and changed your redirect. And I was thinking of having the hex codes show up as a tooltip, but in the end figured I couldn't be stuffed. If anyone wants to create 50 faux colour chart names for them all (like "Zombie decomposition", "Half-breed", et al) it's easy to add title="Zombie decomposition" in each div. Pup • Talkies • 01:27 02 Aug
I had an idea to expand this; you could give the different shades names as if they’re on the Dulux colour chart.--Winstanley1 (talk) 23:43, August 1, 2012 (UTC)
That sounds like a funny idea...but why not create a new article with shades or hues or some other set of minor differences and give them names. They beauty of this article is its briefness and simplicity. If there were names, I doubt I would have laughed, and I guess they would distract from the "gag" or point of the article. Maybe. --ShabiDOO 02:30, August 2, 2012 (UTC)
Neutral. Good, buuut 50 shades of gray is too boring. TC02(Chat with me) 21:46, August 5, 2012 (UTC)
Featured. Fade to grey RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 16:26, August 11, 2012 (UTC) This article has passed VFH and was featured on 11 August 2012. This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.