Nom + Cajek. I always thought this was quite funny, and given the rapidly falling standards of VFH, I say it should definitely have a shot now. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:36, July 9, 2010 (UTC)
Almost but no martini The idea is very good but the writing, imnho, needs some tweaking. The best ideas ought to have the most hours in the edit chamber to polish the thing and make it shine, and this has the potential to go that route. Aleister 20:19 9 7
Against. I like the idea and runs reasonably well but let down by random story additions (relevance of Batman and Riddler for example?) to become a feature. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 09:56, July 10, 2010 (UTC)
Against. A lot of the wording is, honestly, bad. The lede appears to flat-out contradict itself. Some of the sentences are borderline ungrammatical. Needs work before it can go to feature. pillow talk 01:18, July 16, 2010 (UTC)
Re: Guildernsiteinsineinineisni: To quote someone who very recently voted on that UnNews about the camera: "It's not special, but it's featurable." About every week someone says something terribly depressing like this. If that doesn't indicate falling standards, then I don't know even what. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 06:30, July 11, 2010 (UTC)
It's interesting that you only hear about VFH's standards falling, isn't it? Never rising. No one ever says, "Hey, looks like them featured articles are gettin' good again." Which leads me to conclude we've been gradually sucking more since 2005. –SirSkullthumper,MD(criticize•writings•formspring) 01:28 Jul 16, 2010
The nomination was not successful. rm 22%TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 06:04, July 16, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.