Uncyclopedia:VFH/21st Century Nazis

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

21st Century Nazis (history, logs)

Article: 21st Century Nazis

Score: -1.5 raped Irishmen

Nominated by:
For: 2
  1. Nom and For Hilarious and ironic.- 06:42 2 May Sir FSt. (QotF BFF NotM) YTTETalk!Read!Sign!Whore!CMC!Pee!
  2. Aw hell It's okay I guess. The author's obviously a moron though. -OptyC Sucks! Icons-flag-us CUN15:41, 3 May
Against: 3.5
  1. Symbol against vote Against.--Sycamore (Talk) 15:58, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. Symbol against vote Against. - so much setup, so little punchline... --Hyperbole 02:31, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  3. Non-Mhaille Nazi Article --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 21:36, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  4. Against. 21:17, 2 March 2009 (UTC)
  1. Symbol neutral vote Abstain. - It's sort of funny, but also not. --SPY Administrator (Complain|I rock|In memoriam) HMRFRA Bluegarrisoncapsig.png 30px-Sucrose_b.gif WH 20:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
  2. Symbol neutral vote Abstain. I just watched Schindler's List T_T --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent Icons-flag-au Noobaward Wotm Unbooks mousepad GUN 12:00, 3 May 2008 (UTC)
  3. Abstain And a reluctant one at that. I really want to vote for, because the sudden last section is comedically good. The overall concept is a good comedic idea and could spawn something incredibly funny. But, as Hyperbole said, there is a lot of setup, leading up to a small punchline. I really do like the punchline once the article gets around to it, but in order to properly advance the article along, there's got to be some more laughs along the way. Nothing that will detract from the final concept, but chuckles that keep the reader interested, rather than just copy-pasting thoughts about solving world issues. Make the other passages funny, and not just ironic overall. This article can be extremely good, if some more effort is put into it, and I wouldn't object to it being featured now, which is why I'm abstaining (though it doesn't look like it will be), but I'd particularly like to see this article improved upon to get it to a featurable state. Also, that opening picture at the top is absolutely perfect. Just as a side note. -RAHB 10:41, 4 May 2008 (UTC)


← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Personal tools