For. (MrN9000 rewrite) Funnybony 15:18, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
For. Yea, it's a bit listy, but I think that makes sense in an article like this where there are so many different opinions... MrNFork you! 16:52, Feb 5
For. I'll be reading Terry Deary's Angry Aztecs on 20/12/12. --••••••WAR KICKS ASS!!!!!PEACE RULES!!!!!! VEGGIES FAIL BIG TIMEmeat is MURDEREUTHANASIA IS WRONGMERCY DEATH IS FINE - Are you IN or are you OUT of the LOOP? 18:38, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
For the end is near! 81.165.226.51 14:41, February 11, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 5
Against This has some good ideas in it but it's also a random mess. mAttlobster. (hello) 14:20, February 6, 2010 (UTC)
Against for the same reason as Matt. •••Necropaxx(T){~}Monday, 09:52, Feb 8 2010
Against As above really, I couldn't get along with this one. --ChiefjusticeDS 12:22, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
Against. By trying to include too much this article has lost its direction in my view. RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 12:47, February 8, 2010 (UTC)
Against. There's a good article in here, but it's buried a little. Needs a bit of tough love - this could probably be improved by cutting out about a third of the content, leaving it leaner, meaner, and punchier. Plus, some of the extraneous bits are, as observed elsewhere, a bit random, and drag the article down. --UU - natter12:11, Feb 12
Comments
This article has been redone by MrN9000, those who love his style will enjoy it this go around. Funnybony 15:18, February 5, 2010 (UTC)
Everything the man just said above is wrong on so many levels... This is Funnybony's article, and he will be getting the FA credit in the unlikely event that this is featured. MrNFork you! 16:52, Feb 5
It's close, but I'm not quite there yet. I think it needs a bit of cleanup yet. It is still a bit random (Samuel Jackson?) and uses "I" maybe once too often. I like the direction though and I know with a bit more love MrN will turn this into something much better. so, for now, abstain. -OptyCSucks! CUN16:20, 6 Feb
The nomination was not successful. The end is not near after allMrNFork you! 12:16, Feb 12 This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 12:16, February 12, 2010 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.
