Nom & for. I find it rather hypocritical that AAAAAAAAA! was featured but not one. It's brilliant! Come on, who's with me? Teh Rote 23:29, 10 April 2008 (UTC)
For 000011100 10001110 100010111 --Knucmo2 00:55, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Eh The Morse code article is way better. This just looks like random nonsense --SirDJ~Irreverent 01:47, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
Against. Anything that takes that much effort to understand isn't worth it. and most of it's not funny when you do know what it says. And AAA is funnier when you don't. And... Just no. --SirU.U.Esq.VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee12:45, Apr 11
The nomination was not successful. rm -3~~SirLjlego,GUN[talk] This article did not pass VFH and was removed on 21:39, 11 April 2008 (UTC). This page is now archived; do not edit it, it will have no effect.