Uncyclopedia:VFH

1. Nom and for. Another great one from Orian. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 14:58, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Very good. Reminds me of a nicer version of Shaun of the Dead. Padddy5 17:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Brilliant. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 17:53, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
4. For. Yahhh. - [02:32 9 July 2009] PlebYettie
5. For. As per PEEreview Puppy On The Radio Bark! 05:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
6. For Staircase 05:13, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
7. Bless. Mr Zheliel ^Brute! It's 10:32 ...with savings!

• Against. Not a VFH contender in my view.--RomArtus (talk). 09:05, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

• abstain. hm, i wasn't a fan of this one. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom and for I found this on Special:Random. It's funny, and it made me laugh quite a bit. Staircase 05:46, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Blatant Ripoff of Red Light. Also, I miss THE :( Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 06:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Oh well goes well, or something like that —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 04:26, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Car! Mr Zheliel ^Brute! It's 10:36 ...with savings!
5. For. 87.65.146.9 15:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

1. against. eh, red light was better. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:41, 8 July 2009

(UTC) Against. This just a lot more cruder than red light..that's all. --RomArtus (talk). 09:00, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

• Self For. 3 Pee Reviews, necessary edits, lotsa effort and here i am Acrolo 13:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
• For. Reminds me of back when honkeys ran the place. You know, like now. Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 04:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• for. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:33, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

• Against. —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 04:42, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. I seldom complain about images but here, the B/W / color images should be turned all B/W. Also the stretching out of the characters spoils the goodness. Oh - unless you mean it to look more like a game by that? Sir EXPIRED  or is it exempt? 07:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Reply to comment It's not exactly the easiest thing to find images that represent both a narrative story and a PC game in one, I think the mixture of black and white pictures on colour give it the gaming/historical feel it needs. If you look at the pee review you can follow the processes i went through for imagery :D. Acrolo 08:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Nom & For. I'm not particularly high on this, but it did better in Pee review then I thought it would, so I might as well take a shot. I'd try to improve it, but the article is based on audios that some friends and I did four years ago, so the whole "improve this" thing really isn't much of an option. That all being said, most the teh funniez come from the audios, so if you can't play them I'd like to request that you refrain from voting, please (or not, none of you have to fucking listen to me, obviously). So yeah. That's about it. Vote away. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 13:37, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

1. For —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 04:39, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

• Against. Even without me knowing anything about this game..I can't see this as a VFH. --RomArtus (talk). 11:34, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Sorry. As much as I love your MGS articles, this is not as good as the others. pillow talk 20:29, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain. Metal Gear Solid 3 was already featured, and after reading and listening to this, it's not quite as funny as the original non-unscript one. Now if you wanna re-write Metal Gear Solid 4: Guns of the Patriots, I'd love to see it, but another MGS3 is unneccessary. Don Puttano cHeDDs 19:21,7July,2009

  Yeah, I see where you're coming from, I just wrote the article to accompany the articles is all. And I think I will tackle MGS4 at some point sooner or later, seeing as its author seems to have disappeared. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:25, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

• abstain. never played the games, don't know what's going on. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:17, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom and strong for. Hilarious, and another great UnBook from Woody. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 23:48, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2. He makes me sick. And enraged. I'm sick with rage. ~ 13:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Selffor If this isn't my best work, it's the article I'm most proud of. Sorry for the length. Hehehe Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:11, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Weak For. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 21:53, Jul 9

No against votes

• abstain. eh, well-written, but i can't see it being a feature. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:15, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. More disturbing that funny as it stands. I wanted to vote yes but then there are nutters who would attempt to kill someone like Phelps (or anyone else) like this. If there is an alternative ending which keeps to the spirit of the story about hating someone then I would like to change my vote. --RomArtus (talk). 09:24, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

1. snf. spent a goodly deal of time on this. whaddya think? Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 18:00, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2. I think it rocks! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 18:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Love it!. ^Dame 20:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Fantastic. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 23:24, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
5. For. On balance I say you have pulled this off and it well illustrated, formatted and also importantly, well written. Without reading the real life of Wild Bill , I don't know where the truth stops and the parody starts but I enjoyed it all the same. --RomArtus (talk). 06:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
6. For. Very well written, definitely worthy of a feature. Acrolo 08:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
7. For. Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 18:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
8. That's pretty fucking fantastic, Cheevers. pillow talk 20:02, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
9. Strong For. This is what an Uncyclopedia article is supposed to be. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 21:37, Jul 9
10. Strong, Strong for. I agree with Necro. Perfect. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 21:46, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

1. Self For I did my vewwy vewwy best. Padddy5 11:47, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. It may need a few more hyperlinks, but it's a nice article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 15:34, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Yes this is good for a VFh. I liked the intro and the jokes a lot. May be misses a para at the end otherwise deserves featuring. RomArtus (talk). 10:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
4. For. Sir EXPIRED  or is it exempt? 10:57, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
5. weak for. a few things too insignificant to not vote for. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:18, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
6. For Staircase 23:32, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

• Abstain.. Feels unfinished. And the words don't flow as well as would like them to. Call me picky, but I feel this could be better. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 22:53, Jul 6
• Abstain. Discuss perhaps his death with some external links or perhaps related links, but it is indeed incomplete Acrolo 12:01, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom+For. A great unnews by Modus. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 10:32, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Nice --Sog1970 12:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
3. for-ish. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:33, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
4. For. as a person who has written too many typical MJ unewses i am jealous Acrolo 08:53, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
5. For. Sometimes you have to tackle it from a different angle. Like this. Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 04:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
6. Malapropisms FTW! Also curse you voter apathy! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 08:01, Jul 9
7. For. A good idea, well done. Modus, you make me sick. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 09:40, Jul 9

1. Against.. Nothing about Michael Jackson is funny. Sir An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays TALK 14:08, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. per above.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 17:45, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Nah. Amusing, but doesn't rise to the level of a feature IMHO. pillow talk 20:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

1. SelfNomAndFor Ok so I got a favourable review and I'm a little board so just thought I'd see if I can get away with this.    Orian57    Talk   16:12 5 July 2009
2. LazyFor. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 16:19, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. For A very brilliant idea--IwillKILLyou333 Talk If you dare 21:49, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Yeah I'll go for it. Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:50,5July,2009
5. For. ^Dame 13:45, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
6. for, but the joshy gimmick has about run its course. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
7. For all the way. —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 00:56, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
8. Sick of Joshy? It can't be so! I do think that this is his last article, though. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 03:08, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
9. For. Ahh I loved that programme...*cough* not that as a mature person I watched it on a regular basis. - [02:35 9 July 2009] PlebYettie

1. Against Sorry, but it wasn't all that funny and I'm sort of sick of little Joshy. Staircase 16:18, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Abstain A curate's egg --Asahatter (annoy) 08:04, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Reluctant Abstain. I like the Joshy character, but it's become too much of a good thing in a short time. Sorry.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 16:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

This is the lazt time I'm gonna use him, then he goes to bed, I do sort of see what your saying though.    Orian57    Talk   18:19 6 July 2009

1. Abstain. A bishop's omelette . --RomArtus (talk). 10:23, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Abstain. Only because i dont know what the original story is about. Acrolo 09:34, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Self For An article I enjoyed writing, I fixed everything that was wrong after I submitted it to Pee Review so figured I might as well have a stab at this. --ChiefjusticeDS 07:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Sure, it makes me go snigger, why not? I live in your eyes 22:58, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. For. Polished my article to a mirror sheen. Padddy5 11:26, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
4. For. I just finished doing this so I was a short step away from nomming anyway. Puppy On The Radio Bark! 01:44, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
5. For Staircase 02:19, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
6. For. I actually didn't want to laugh, but I laughed anyway. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 07:36, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
7. Weak For. Everything up to the actual interruption was, shall we say blah, but that one section was very, very funny. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 07:54, Jul 9

1. Against. Okay first effort, but not front page. May I add, your reviews are excellent. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~
2. against. a good first effort but not front-page stuffs. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:07, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Abstain. a bonus that it is at least an original idea (i think !) but it still lacks polish and I don't thank you set up the main premise well enough to encourage further reading. --RomArtus (talk). 10:33, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

• Abstain. It needs a bit more work to make it to the front page. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 15:10, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom + For. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 05:13, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Tehehe. ^_^ -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:57, 5 Jul 19:57, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Weak For Don Puttano cHeDDs 22:56,5July,2009
4. POTR. Mr Zheliel ^Brute! ~05:17/6 of July
5. For. --Docile hippopotamus 06:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
6. For. I get it! BTW, I think this article is the written form of physical comedy. Lowbrow stuff, just like I like it.   BAN MAGNET! <0:41 Jul 08, 2009>
7. For. As per Cajek. | King Joseph® | Contact Goa Tse Clan Priest | Goa Tse Clan Sign Up | | My Brute | 02:49, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
8. For. It's a me, Mario! one-joke article, albeit one that will work well on the main page.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 20:04, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. I don't normally say this but this article needs to about one paragraph long as that is the basic joke. The rest of the text is filler - though if that had been funnier then it would have worked a lot better i.e. medical nonsense or such like before it disappeared off the page. --RomArtus (talk). 10:41, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Weak Against solely on the grounds of poor formatting. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 23:20, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. I'm really just very flattered that you've looked at my work as a potential feature when it really does not differ that much in regard to text from the Wikipedia article. Puppy On The Radio Bark! 11:15, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• abstain. i seem to be missing the joke. the text is copied from the wikipedia article, the images are faded, theres one or two more references to MJ...anything else? Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. I'd like the text to be more humorous. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 15:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
• @LongLiver: How is this poorly formatted at all? --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 23:21, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

The faded pictures, also I caught a couple spelling mistakes in there. I'm strict about that, BTW. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 13:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. I like the joke, but I think the text needs to be at least a little funny as well rather than just a wikipedia c&p. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:32, 06 Jul 2009

@LongLiver: I ran it through a spell check. Other than the medical terminology and the US v UK spelling the only thing my spell check picked up was "depigmentation", "overexpression" and "underexpression." All are valid, although to help the pedantic I've hyphenated the latter two. The images stand as they are, for what I though were obvious reasons. One thing I would like to do though is be able to put in a horizontal line but adjust the colour, as that is partially the reason why the end has had to be hidden rather than just faded and I've hidden one header and replaced it with just large text. If anyone has any ideas...

@Spang, @Romartus and @Socky - Fair point. Give me 48 hours... if it's not done then give me a further 48... BTW Romartus, I love that idea... Puppy On The Radio Bark! 00:26, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

• If this does pass VFH, I propose a reskin! --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 20:05, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

• I just want to get back in there and make the text funny as well. The one joke works, but given the comments both anti and neutral, it could work better. --Puppy On The Radio Bark! 21:11, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

*Okay, this is now starting to really bug me. I can't vote for this myself as I don't think it's strong enough to stand as a feature article as it currently stands without a bit of re-writing, and I can't rewrite until this is no longer in VFH. As much as it would give me a kick to see this featured, I would also feel terrible if it featured when I knew it could be improved. Therefore author request, can I have this back for the moment so I can do to it what I want to do to it first? (I don't know how to move this from the queue, so a little guidance would be appreciated.)Puppy On The Radio Bark! 01:49, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

1. --Sog1970 13:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
2. for Taffy! --^Dame 16:35, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Great article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 00:05, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
4. Nicely written and funny --I'mthedaddy 12:45, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
5. For I've been waiting for this tooth fairy... —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 04:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

No against votes

• Abstain It was good, but the end lost it for me. Staircase 15:31, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain. A reluctant abstain ..just don't think this is VFH though it has plenty of nice touches.--RomArtus (talk). 10:28, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
• abstain. well done, but not quite there. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:36, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom & For Another action-packed Unscript from the current WotM. --^Dame 13:01, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
2. For. I'm drowning in all these great articles. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 13:10, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Self-for I loved writing this one.    Orian57    Talk   13:16 1 July 2009
4. For. Why does she keep saying "yah!"? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 01:21, Jul 2
5. Yah Sorry, I know it's cheesy, but I had to say it. Don Puttano cHeDDs 02:42,2July,2009
6. forish. sure. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:32, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
7. Sonje! okay. —Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 17:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

   Dude, I just nommed it. Everyone knows I never learnt how to write. This is Orian57's handywork. But your enthusiasm is admirable. --^Dame 17:55, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

   Mmmmm, still. —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 04:30, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

8. For. I liked it YAH! brilliant spoof on open water and open water 2! Acrolo 12:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

   Ah! Thank you! That was the movie I was trying to remember, Deep blue sea has genetically enhanced sharks in in it.    Orian57    Talk   12:52 3 July 2009

9. As per below (my comment) Mr Zheliel ^Brute! ~12:26/5/July

   To clarify that's both "proud moment" and "For"?    Orian57    Talk   12:29 5 July 2009

10. For. - [02:36 9 July 2009] PlebYettie

1. Against. --RomArtus (talk). 19:10, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
2. Against Didn't enjoy it. Staircase 01:34, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against per above. --Docile hippopotamus 01:27, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

• This is the first time I've commented. A proud moment. Mr Zheliel ^Brute! ~12:26/5/July

1. For. Read it, loved it, read it in mp3. T. (talk) 04:59, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2. For. I have made a reservation against what looks like a Cajek ejaculation on the last picture caption. Correct me If I am wrong ! --RomArtus (talk). 08:51, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. per above, was on VFG Mn-z 17:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
4. SelfFor at least this isn't filial piety something else, something that won't offend people!   BAN MAGNET! <19:42 Jun 25, 2009>
5. For. Sadly, it isn't filial piety. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 20:29, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For. He made (most of) the changes I specified in my review. I think it's ready. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 23:02, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
7. for. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 16:42, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
8. For I liked it--Sir Sunbeam no u F@H KUN 08:16, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For Its alright.—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 00:02, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
10. For. Loved everything except the fourth-wall-breaking italicized bits. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 19:21, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against on the count that all of Cajek's articles are exactly the same Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 19:46, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Still needs a little trimming. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:46, 5 Jul 19:46, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against. Maybe I am missing something ... NaturalBornKieler (talk) 07:38, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

• @TKF: Touché   BAN MAGNET! <20:33 Jun 25, 2009>
• Abstain. You know, TKF brings up a good point. And this article was a little... eh. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 01:21, Jun 27
• Comment. Like the concept, but execution... I found myself wanting to want it to be better if it makes you feel better. Puppy On The Radio Bark! 20:33, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

1. .5SNF I've always really liked this song. Just out of curiosity, I'd like to see how it does the 2nd time around. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 02:41, Jun 24
2. Yes As this guy is even more pathetic than me. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 02:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. I remember this! I feel so old   BAN MAGNET! <6:55 Jun 24, 2009>
4. Yes per the opposite of what Dexter said. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 08:15, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
5. Just I was kinda torn on this, but I've decided it's the right sort of teriible, and the page itself was pretty good.    Orian57    Talk   17:11 24 June 2009
6. Die, you wrist-cutting emo faggot, DIIEEE!!! Norsk Arysk Blakk Mettall! RAHHH!! Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 18! 18:49 June 24 '09
7. For. --Docile hippopotamus 22:09, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
8. For. they should all die, you know "they" --- player2- 09:17, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. Tres bean. ImNotASunbeam Have you been doing your ironing? 14:01, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
10. For. per above. Mn-z 17:21, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
11. Very For. I thought I would vote against this, and the song is just a tad bit "over the top" for my own tastes, but the black background and absurdly large picture at the bottom make it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:03, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
12. 4 -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:28, 25 Jun
13. Why are my tight pants so uncomfortable?~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 02:52, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
14. For. I think I helped make this or something... - UnIdiot | | Talk | Contribs - 03:29, Jun 27
15. For—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 23:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
16. ' For.'--IwillKILLyou333 Talk If you dare 17:30, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Unlistenable. I guess it's unlistenability is the joke, but I can't laugh much when the MP3 is literally hurting my soul. pillow talk 20:07, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Against. Too random for me, nice background and stuff but the song coulda been funnier if played with more than one tune and rhythmic instead of minotonous strumming Acrolo 05:22, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

   That's what makes it funneh, actually Colour Sig For Make Mahm00shA Look Cool 18! 14:41 June 26 '09

3. Against Per my comments last time it was nommed. -RAHB 14:43, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Against. Liked the way you'd emo-ified the page, but the unlistenability puts me off. Nameable • mumble? 14:10, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
5. Against Staircase 04:44, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
6. Against. Putting on a funny voice ruins the joke. Also, this sounds more like http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q1liOH77avA than an emo song. Sir An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays TALK 14:20, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
7. Against. Was a for, until I actually listened to the thing. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 19:16, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
8. Against Per my comments last time it was nommed. Which was per RAHB's comments last time this was nommed. So per RAHB this time as well. Or instead. Whichever floats your boat. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 09:26, Jul 9

1. abstain. i love the look of the page, but i wasn't a fan of the audio. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:44, 29 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Abstain The look of the page works, and I laughed out loud at the "Hea Guys" section. The song and audio wasn't as good though. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:54, 1 July 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. Would anyone object to me doing a proper version of the audio with like proper instrumentation? Sir An Ape that Only Exists on Thursdays TALK 23:50, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
• Reply You have a good idea going here, and are very close with this one... Id say work on that fo sure and let us know when the new version is out and im sure many againsters would reconsider.

1. nom + 4 another find from VFG. --Mn-z 15:38, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2. Fantastic! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 16:12, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. I love when you can guess the author without looking at the page history. IronLung 21:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
4. For Don't care if the article is crappy or not!!!—Flutter (Talk•Games•Fun Pages•Awards•Help) 20:19, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
5. . -OptyC Sucks! CUN20:33, 23 Jun
6. Weak For. I would like to see a little higher word-to-pic ratio. But consider me serviced either way. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 23:49, Jun 23

   Well I think it needs a higher pic-to-word ratio. --Mn-z 04:45, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

7. for. especially for the conundrum part. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:36, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
8. A big fan! -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)
9. For. Enjoyed it very much. Sir Sunbeam no u F@H KUN 05:47, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
10. For. -- DameViktoria - (Contribs) - (Talk) - (Block log) 19:42, 5 Jul 19:42, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
11. For. Sir EXPIRED  or is it exempt? 10:35, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
12. For. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 19:03, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
13. For. It works for me. Every time. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 09:18, Jul 9
14. Self-for. I just realized I didn't nom this and never voted for it. Well, I like it. pillow talk 14:59, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. Reads like a male teen fantasy which is fine except that is basically the joke..Not a VFH in my view.--RomArtus (talk). 12:01, 23 June 2009 (UTC)
2. I LOVE this concept. The article just left something to be desired.... I mean other than sex. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 00:48, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
3. Against - Per Romartus. Staircase 01:38, 5 July 2009 (UTC)

• I thought I'd probably get a comment like Romartus's, so this might bear explaining: "Fan service" is a term for a scene in an anime where a female character becomes nearly nude for little-to-no reason except that teen nerds want to see her drawn that way. So the joke is that literal "fan service" includes a lot of figurative "fan service." Yeah, I know, if you have to explain it, it isn't funny. pillow talk 15:41, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

You should have put that in nom as a guide to people who are not into anime. Still...I won't change my vote except the comments but thanks for letting us know the humour source for the article.--RomArtus (talk). 06:12, 24 June 2009 (UTC)

• Can't decide. The introduction was good enough, but the rest of it just felt drawn out and unnecessary. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • tweetings) 01:15 Jun 25, 2009
• Abstain. I cant put my finger in on it Acrolo 12:57, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom & For. Got some coffee in my nose laughing. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 12:15, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2. For. Great UnNews! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 12:27, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. *Sings* what if god was one of us! -- Acrolo 13:16, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
4. for It got a good many laughs from me. Ban Magnet Burninator! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 19:52, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
5. For. I shared NaturalBornKieler's experience, but with apple juice. ^Dame 22:51, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
6. SoSo. --UU - Oim frum Englund! 14:40, Jun 23
7. Strong For. I sure hope He has a sense of humor. Otherwise... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 00:07, Jun 24
8. This article was one of the top 10 articles of 2009(ish) Saberwolf116 02:05, 25 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. It is good enough for VFH but we are putting up a lot of religiously styled stories of late. --RomArtus (talk). 00:00, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

   Oh, that is only because we are nearing the end of times. NaturalBornKieler (talk) 15:55, 25 June 2009 (UTC)

10. For Staircase 00:36, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
11. Bless. Don Puttano cHeDDs 21:39,30June,2009
12. Excellent. ~ 21:50, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
13. For. Though those cray-zee Muslims might not like it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 21:23, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
14. For. --I'mthedaddy 10:24, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
15. For. Hmm... MrN  03:20, Jul 5

1. Against meh. --Mn-z 15:43, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
2. against. didn't really hit the funnybone for me. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 15:01, 26 June 2009 (UTC)
3. Against I didn't really find much funny after the first bit. I think God as an ambivalent putz would've been funnier.~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 21:45, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Against. Don't like going against, but didn't find myself laughing. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 20:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Nom & For. Clemens fixed this up a bit; I now think it's feature worthy. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 17:58, 14 June 2009 (UTC)

   It's not. It has rptqts.75.18.174.159 03:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   You can't invalidate a nom without being an admin. In fact, I don't think I can even do this. Staircase 03:32, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   Stop being a jerk, IP, or you'll get banned (Hint: you're already banned. Moo ha-ha!). Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 03:57, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

2. Objective For. It's definitely good enough now. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM 22:22, 14 June 2009 (UTC)
3. For. I hope people remember I nommed this before it was cool!   BAN MAGNET! <6:41 Jun 15, 2009>
4. For. I do not usually think it appropriate to vote for your own stuff, but I believe that a satirical and reasonably balanced article on the subject is important. Thanks to Cajek, for his brilliant foresight! Thanks to Guildensternenstein for his invaluable advice and help. Thanks to all of you for giving this another chance. --Clemens177 07:03, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
5. CLEARLY IF YOU WERE TO BE HIT BY A TRAIN, YOU WOULD DESERVE TO DIE, BECAUSE YOU ARE A GODDAMN COMMUNIST. EVERYONE ON THAT TRAIN DESERVED TO DIE. THERE WAS NOT ONE AMONGST THEM WHO WAS SO CAPITALIST THAT THEY COULD DESIGN A CLOAKING RAY THAT WOULD CLOAK A VALLEY. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL STOP THE WORLD. WITH MY FREEZE RAY, I WILL FIND THE TIME TO FIND THE PARTS OF A MAN HACKED APART SO I COULD SEW THEM TOGETHER at random. THAT'S RIGHT, I'M TALKING TO YOU, ELLSWORTH MONKTON TOOHEY. Inebriated 06:25, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
6. For. per above. Mn-z 15:53, 16 June 2009 (UTC)
7. For. Its OK. --Docile hippopotamus 04:01, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
8. For. Much better! ^Dame 16:37, 18 June 2009 (UTC)
9. For. I farted... er I mean.... I LIKE IT! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Teh pwnerator (talk • contribs) 21:42, 16 May 2009 (UTC)
10. For. 24.108.253.110 07:51, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
11. For. communism's for commies! Wurstnachtmare 21:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
12. For, if I get a template! —Flutter^{Nayely Rodriguez} Tuwoolookie! | My History | Brute! 04:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

1. Against. I hate repeated quotations from the same source.75.18.174.159 03:22, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   Striking vote based on bannination. Did I do something wrong? Tell my creator! IronLung 04:07, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   You know what? We should unban this guy. I think it's funny with his stupid reasons for voting against and crap. Staircase 04:10, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

   I agree with Steps. ~llh3!~ ~vandalise here~ 16:47, 19 June 2009 (UTC)

2. Against. Don't find it funny. --Docile hippopotamus 10:18, 17 June 2009 (UTC)
3. Genuine against vote. –Flashfreez 06:53, 27 June 2009 (UTC)
4. Against. This feels too much like an excuse to talk about Atlas Shrugged, rather than write a funny article about it. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 18:27, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

• This is too long for me to read! Gah! Staircase 06:43, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
• Leave the striking of the votes to members of the cabal. Thanks. ~ 07:40, 15 June 2009 (UTC)
  • M'bad. IronLung 02:22, 16 June 2009 (UTC)

Abstain. a reluctant abstain but not sure if the semi-conversational style works . Also it talks about the book and then splits off to mention the writer - and then back again to the book. It is an ambitious attempt on a difficult subject matter but I wonder if it would helped to be more general reader friendly. --RomArtus (talk). 22:15, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

• If you have to explain the joke... The explanation at the ends of these sister articles bug me more and more every time I read them. Get rid of them and I'll gladly vote For. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:07, 16 Jun
• Comment. It looks like this article is still being worked on by the original author. Over 4 kilobytes of material has been added since the nomination. Mn-z 18:20, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

  Objectively, I hope. There's nothing I despise more than seeing edits that aren't Rational. Sir Modusoperandi ^Brute! 18:38, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

• abstain. very long, and i got bogged down, and i'm not really familiar with any of this stuff. Lance AdmiralGerrycheeversGunTalk 13:20, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
• Abstain.. I voted against on the first nomination, and while it's a little better, it's still not a for. Don Puttano cHeDDs 02:36,20June,2009 02:36, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
• I'll go with an abstain, 'cause I've never read the book, and you kind of need to know what the book is about to get it. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~KUN PotM VFH VFP PEEING Der Unwehr~} 19:47, Jun 20