• Delete rambling unformatted mess, MrN9000 removed the ICU and added maintenance templates, but the original authors were only active for a day. --Mn-z 04:54, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Not worth keeping at all. pillow talk 05:17, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. It's orphaned, too. —Pelargonium MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 06:33, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete more wacky-war-cruft. --Mn-z 04:10, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Of a piece with Battle of Mount Isa, which we have savaged below. And the See Also suggests there's one more. Spıke ¬ 04:23 23-Dec-09

that see also article is unrelated to the warcruft, if its the one I'm thinking about. --Mn-z 04:30, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

You're right; Battle of Ayers Rock in the See Also gets you to a decent article. I suspect this is a placeholder for another Wacky War article he intended to write later. Spıke ¬ 04:50 23-Dec-09

• Delete. Man, I really hate these fake-war articles. pillow talk 04:44, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. What the... Was that about the American Civil War or Australia...or both? —Pelargonium MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 06:31, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete this article is about a British Prime minister. You wouldn't know it from reading the article though. --Mn-z 03:42, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Panoramic, and incoherent. Spıke ¬ 03:56 23-Dec-09
• Delete. because I agree with the above reasons. --TrekCaptain 04:01, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. I liked the line about being "the patron saint of other saints who have been exhumed for relics," but even that was too random. pillow talk 04:46, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. —Pelargonium MUN ♦ Talkpage ♦ My Contributions ♦ 06:27, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

• Essentially unchanged, except for the ill-advised deletion of a section "Early Life," from the original draft written in Jan-06 by an anonIP. Spıke ¬ 03:56 23-Dec-09

• Delete. Wacky War stories, yet again. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:26, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Domo,o,jkhrdhyt hnjm e45sm b vn jy b k vmj bj,jk 22:27, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Author got my hopes up by using "sanguinary" in the first sentence. But this article jumbles the US Civil War, the Australian outback, and of course platypuses, aimlessly. Spıke ¬ 22:44 22-Dec-09
• Delete. --TrekCaptain 23:37, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. per above. --Mn-z 04:08, December 23, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Has anyone ever written a good war article? I haven't seen one. pillow talk 04:47, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. This towncruft is clearly going nowhere. --Count of Monkey Crisco 22:17, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Winchester, New Hampshire has a pickle festival and lives; Yeppoon has a pineapple festival and is going to die! A generic little article choked with templates urging it to become something. Spıke ¬ 22:42 22-Dec-09
• Delete. -- Domo,o,jkhrdhyt hnjm e45sm b vn jy b k vmj bj,jk 22:50, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. --TrekCaptain 23:36, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. --Mn-z 04:09, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

• Keep. - I think it's cute. -- Kip the DipTalkWorksTreat WHORE! ☃ 03:16, Dec. 20, 2009
• Template is harmless and cute. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 04:03, 20 December 2009
• Strongest keep I'd feel guilty if we killed it. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 14:47, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep One of the better templates - and pointless is everything. mattlobster. (hello) 22:17, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• I'd feel guilty otherwise. Plus I kinda like it the way Charlie Brown liked that Christmas Tree.  ~  Happytimes are here!  (talk) (stalk)   03:59, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete pointless and little used template. --Mn-z 02:54, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. As with Template:Toasty. Spıke ¬ 02:59 20-Dec-09
• Nuke it per above. --TrekCaptain 06:10, December 20, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete.. It's only on one page - National Guilt Association. We may as well transclude it onto there and delete it - it's apparently totally worthless as a general-use template. pillow talk 03:31, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete per Hyperbole. -- Domo,o,jkhrdhyt hnjm e45sm b vn jy b k vmj bj,jk 23:09, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• 14th active nom. --Mn-z 02:54, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

• Keep. per the fact that this is the last bastion of FREEDOM OF SPEECH on teh internetz or something. --Mn-z 17:18, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 17:20, 19 December 2009
• Keep.---So NOW we know what is Sacred here? Is this not racism against racism? I read where you insult religions, cultures, everyone, and I never knew what was the "line" until I crossed it. Conclusion: NOTHING is sacred on Uncyclopedia, EXCEPT "African Americans". Everyone else can go to hell in name of Freedom of speech. And this in spite of the fact that BNA DOES EXIST AS A REAL PROBLEM IN SOCIETY? Mike Tyson's BNA!? I rest my case. For reason of reality alone it should be kept.--Funnybony 19:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. Well written, mildly funny.    moonshine   • 17:56 • Saturday, 19-12-2009
• Keep It's kinda funny. Is this nomination only because it's offensive? I find John Lennon's odour offensive, but that doesn't mean I wanted to kill him. Why do you? Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 19:36, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. I don't like it, but I find the idea of deleting things just because they might be offensive far more distasteful. You stupid niggers. -OptyC Sucks! CUN19:47, 19 Dec
• Um, yeah. Keep. ---Pelargonium MUN (Talk) (Contribs) (Survey!) 19:58, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. I see Romartus voting, I go the opposite ;P but seriously they're just trying to get rid of it cos of offensiveness and that's just not a good reason —talk 20:45, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. The last time I checked, Chris Rock used half this article for his stand up routine. Nowhere near delete quality. Defo needs a rewrite though. ---Matfen815 21:27, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Nigger hush. Until it's nommed for just being shit as opposed to any racism, I vote Keep.. The Ugandan Government Should Cease Existence. Yoweri Museveni can go die, too. Fuck Uganda. 06:59, December 20, 2009 (UTC)

• Recently on VFH. It's racist in a dumb no-satire kind of way. It's not funny. mattlobster. (hello) 17:16, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete.As per above. Why do we have to keep it ? --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 17:25, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. American blacks will take offense at this article, its nigger-jokes, and its photo of an ape. Separatist affectations are ripe for ridicule, but this article repeatedly veers to the race's inherent inferiority. As with the Mohammad/penis photo, the issue is not our freedom of speech but our reputation and that of our hosts when giving offense unnecessarily to comedy. Spıke ¬ 19:26 19-Dec-09
• Delete. Too many musty jokes and an irrelevant "history" section not enough Bad Nigger Attitude. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:12, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Because it's wrong for Funnybony to act like he has a martyr complex when in reality he just writes crappy articles. It's also wrong for me to vote without reading it all the way, but two wrongs make a right, right? --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:24, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• Read it. Still delete. I don't care how many instances of not racism you can claim in your life. If people can easily mistake your speech for hate speech, you need to sit down and think about what you're doing wrong. The hate in this is too chilling for the article to be funny. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:36, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete.normally, i go easy on articles i vote for on this site,but seriously,bashing an a particular ethnic group is not funny at all.mabeye conterversial .but this site isnt made for intellectual debates on the state of a particular race.--Jupiterfox 20:35,December 19,2009 (UTC)
• Delete. I found this unfunny and overly racist, but most importantly, unfunny. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:59, Dec. 20, 2009
• Delete. - It sucks ass. I honestly could care less if it's offensive to black people or symbolic as a beacon of free speech. -- Kip the DipTalkWorksTreat WHORE! ☃ 07:01, Dec. 20, 2009
• Delete. per Kip. I don't give a fuck whether it's offensive. Rewrite it, start over, whatever. But this is just shitty writing. Plus, quite a few of those jokes are just plain plagiarized. pillow talk 03:22, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Don't care about racism, still not funny. --Grand General Wizard Etc x2 and Senator G/K/O/CUNT.K.F. WHORE! ZOTM MAFE VANDL UOTM WOTM TOP10 FP PMOTM UWotM 04:11, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• lol --Roman Dog Bird 23:19, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• So NOW we know what is Sacred here? Is this not racism against racism? I read where you insult religions, cultures, everyone, and I never knew what was the "line" until I crossed it. Conclusion: NOTHING is sacred on Uncyclopedia, EXCEPT "African Americans". Everyone else can go to hell in name of Freedom of speech. And this in spite of the fact that BNA DOES EXIST AS A REAL PROBLEM IN SOCIETY? Mike Tyson's BNA!? I rest my case. For reason of reality alone it should be kept.--Funnybony 19:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. If it isn't deleted, can it be moved to the user's own page instead ? Having read through Funnybony's discussion page, I admit I am puzzled why he thought this particular article would be funny. That it could be placed straight into a racial hate website without an edit is a bit disturbing. I hope I am wrong as regards to the intentions behind this article.--RomArtus Imperator(talk) 17:49, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• BTW: The author of the article is NOT a racist. I have always had African American friends. But NOT those with BNA. Even my African American friends hate BNA. I used to be in the GG (Golden Gloves) and 90% of my team mates were black, and (even in boxing) none had BNA. In fact, if I was racist then how is it I live in the Orient and do business with African-Africans, have an Asian wife, and a Amerasian son!?? You sure the article is by a racist?---Don't be daft!--Funnybony 19:41, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

And what's this BS? "American blacks will take offense at this article"?? (NOTE: All others can go to hell-RIGHT? ha ha ha! Get real!--Funnybony 19:19, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

The MEANING of "racist" based on example of funnybony: "An expatriate multi-lingual cross-culturalist who accepts all cultures and religions - and is a pacifist who lived 12 years in exile rather than kill Vietnamese in Vietnam - married to foreigner with Amerasian child! YEAH!!! That's Racism!! Har har!!!--Funnybony 20:01, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Shut up. Any more and you'll be officially causing drama, so quit. Seriously. Just shut up. It's clearly going to get kept. Now quit. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 20:04, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. Guess what, your article's lame and spastic and it survives I'm going to rewrite the bits that are lame and/or seizure writing, that is to say everything past the first four paragraphs. I'm racist against people who can't write an article that holds together.--Count of Monkey Crisco 20:12, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

  Ouch. Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 20:13, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

  Be your guest!!! And make it better. Everyone! This is Uncyclopedia, I hope--Funnybony 20:22, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• Comment. Tyson and his misconduct don't prove anything about blackness but that (1) gifted athletes get away with lots of stuff, especially (2) in a U.S. where whites now see controversy if they try to correct misconduct by blacks. That's political fad, not racial determinism. Separately, there is no double standard here against individual users, except when criticism elicits overlong defenses. Spıke ¬ 20:21 19-Dec-09

  This nom is probably going to give Mordillo a heart attack, just saying. --Mn-z 20:23, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• I think you guys are getting way too personal and miles off subject. What happened wrong--Funnybony 20:41, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. I do believe that Funnybony's Mike Tyson article IS racist, however. There's a difference between an article about racism and a Racist article... ---Matfen815 21:50, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• Really, quit using "It's racist!" as an excuse to vote delete. Instead, just say, "I don't believe it to be funny." No more. That's all you gotta say. Or just say, "Delete". Hell, that's even simpler. Now shut the fuck up and go write something funny. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 20:48, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• I think 5 out of the 6 delete votes said it's not funny. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:56, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• Strange cause I see two of them. And go write something funny dammit. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 21:02, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• Try hitting Ctrl+F and typing "funny". And NO U. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:34, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

I didn't say it wasn't fnny. It's partly fnny, and partly deep offense given not on the way to being fnny. That's a valid reason to vote Delete. And NO U. Spıke ¬ 22:29 19-Dec-09

Cool down, get rational, and edit

I don't think "handle bias" a valid reason to delete. The solution is to keep (as a real subject that is amusing) and everyone who is interested should edit and rewrite until it's perfect. But, like all articles, it will always be offensive to some one, no matter how it's done. This being my 30th article, I shall go write another one, just for fun. And thanks for keeping the others too! Merry Christmas--Funnybony 21:10, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

I don't think "I don't like the delete reasons" is a valid reason to keep. This may be a real subject within the dark recesses of your mind, but we're here on this page to decide whether or not it's amusing. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 21:34, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry Syn, but I happen to disagree. The idea of deleting this just to be PC offends me far more than the article itself does. Why start down that slippery slope when we all know it just leads to a bland homogeneous Uncyclopedia? Nevermind, I misunderstood what you were getting at. -OptyC Sucks! CUN21:41, 19 Dec

Dr. Fred Bortz says:

"Less Drama, more writing."^*


* This message approved by Dr. Fred Bortz

You are cool and rational...and we're not

I do have a bit of "handle bias": Count offered to rewrite this article; but I believe he will find himself not in a rewrite but a collaboration that will ultimately frustrate him. I worked with the author on the horrible ITSCON for two days, finally concluding that "You have agendas other than humor." Our collaboration ended. What brings this to mind? The sanctimonious section heading. When I copied our dialogue from my talk page to the talk page of ITSCON, the author inserted section headings explaining which days I was "belligerent" and which days I was merely "confused." And sent a couple messages to third parties touting his unconditional cordiality in the same paragraph that he dished more armchair psychology about me. Consequently, my vote on this article was not just based on its offensiveness but on the belief from experience that those parts will never be excised. Spıke ¬ 21:41 22-Dec-09

THIS IS NOT A DISCUSSION PAGE AND YA'LL STILL CANNOT CONDUCT A DISCUSSION IN A CIVILIZED MANNER

So in the spirit of Xmas, the next person writing anything other than FOR or AGAINST will get a holiday period curtsy of me. I'll repeat for all of you who are bound to right something "funny" just underneath this heading. FOR or AGAINST with nice civilized reasoning. MERRY CHRISTMAS! ~ 23:05, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

It should say "write something funny." Homophony has gotten you again, Mr. Foreignpants! - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 00:45, Dec 23

I'll take his "foreign" over your funny words. "Homophony". *giggle* Sir Modusoperandi ^{Brute! Boinc!} 01:05, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

*more laughs* Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 01:49, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

• Yes. I didn't read it. I find the thought of someone actually sitting down and willingly reading this amusing. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 01:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
  • Yes? What he said. Thinking of someone doing that makes happy me.  ~  Happytimes are here!  (talk) (stalk)   03:59, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete.. It isn't an atrocious read though I have no idea what it is about. Seems a bit cruel to delete it. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 16:57, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Not atrocious. (formerly Comment) The article is about something (a video-game character); it has a consistent theme (cast the character as a gigolo); it uses real sentences and paragraphs rather than mere lists of one-liners; and I can't be sure a member of the target audience wouldn't laugh. Said members might need to get a life, but we're discussing the article, not them. Last two sections should die. Spıke ¬ 13:15 21-Dec-09

• Delete. Rally bad fanboy gamercruft. Kind of hurts to read. --Count of Monkey Crisco 15:18, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. I was gonna vote keep, but the last few sections changed my mind. ---Pelargonium MUN (Talk) (Contribs) (Survey!) 21:56, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• No.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 22:01, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. --Mn-z 05:40, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. I skimmed it. Even that made me wince. pillow talk 03:26, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. -- Domo,o,jkhrdhyt hnjm e45sm b vn jy b k vmj bj,jk 23:28, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• Can't review. My eyes glaze over. Spıke ¬ 19:27 18-Dec-09
• Comment. This could make ham glaze over. --Count of Monkey Crisco 20:18, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. That made me chuckle Monkey Crisco, I wish I'd said it. Sadly you're right, this article's hopeless which is a shame really as Kuja's an excellent character. Come on, you all know you'd do him given the chance. --Ozymandiaz 02:25, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. Jeez Romarts, could you make your vote a little more ambiguous? --Count of Monkey Crisco 12:57, December 21, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment. Agree with Spike. Last two paragraphs can go . If the author(s) try to put them back, I'll go into the Delete Camp.--RomArtus Imperator(talk) 15:15, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• Keep. it probably can be pruned into a decent articles, and lists aren't bad in themselves so long as they are not random or rambling. --Mn-z 16:26, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

Agree. But these are. Spıke ¬ 19:23 18-Dec-09

• Weak Keep Has usable content. Perhaps should be pruned and turning into "List of reasons why Picard is better than Kirk.--Count of Monkey Crisco 14:37, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Weak Keep There are some funny jokes in there. But obviously needs some work. Myocardialinfarction 22:53, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Weak keep I removed the listcruft (80% of the article) and a stupid Chuck Norris reference. What's left is a stub, and not a great one, but if we delete it it's just gonna be recreated by some trekkie within an hour anyway. Might as well have this as a start, maybe some nerd will actually do something funny with it. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:53, 19 Dec
• Keep. (formerly Delete) Disappointing that such a key article should be completely lists, notably tournaments of champions about who is the coolest starship captain. Author(s) have stumbled over the nubs of how to ridicule the Patrick Stewart character; but 95% of the article is crap.11:19 18-Dec 95% of the article is now gone; the other 5% is indeed better than a red-link. Spıke ¬ 15:18 19-Dec-09
• STRONG KEEP! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 17:44, 19 December 2009
• WHAT HE SAID! Don't make me use my Picard Maneuver on you.  ~  Happytimes are here!  (talk) (stalk)   03:59, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. (formerly Delete). Spike nuking 95% of the article kinda made it better. --TrekCaptain 19:45, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

Was Optimus, not I. Spıke ¬ 20:40 22-Dec-09

Just take the credit, dammit! Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 20:42, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

well, whoever nuked 95% of the article, they deserve a medal, since they changed my vote.  :) --TrekCaptain 20:50, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete I'm sick of lists. Fucking muderape it, and lock it's creation. The Ugandan Government Should Cease Existence. Yoweri Museveni can go die, too. Fuck Uganda. 09:00, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• "Chuck Norris roundhouse kicks us, and we fall back, he destroys entire worlds, and we fall back, not again, THE LINE MUST BE DRAWN HERE! This far no further, and I will make him PAY for what he's done!" -Captain Picard on Chuck Norris. Also, what Colin said. --Really, really sleepy 09:56, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. A perfect example of what happens to a notable topic over a five-year time period when no regular Uncyclopedian makes any attempt to tend to it. pillow talk 12:21, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• List-cruft. --Jtaylor1 18:26, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Wow, that list was fucking huge. ---Pelargonium MUN (Talk) (Contribs) (Survey!) 22:43, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Oh, wow, a tactical nuke alone won't kill this thing. Time for an ICBM to be used. So yeah, do I need to get more vicious with killing ideas for this article? Complete utter CRAP, and is full of shit-list and other crap. --TrekCaptain 06:14, December 19, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. It now looks like an amputee. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 17:00, December 19, 2009 (UTC)

• weak keep looks like there is some method in that madness. --Mn-z 18:29, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• keepnot so bad but can be improved by "somebody who knows humor"you know who.joke about 12-25 year old males is funny--jupiterfox December 16,2009 (UTC)
• Obvious Keep. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 11:54, 18 December 2009

• Delete. Your article appears to be having a seizure, an unfunny seizure. --Count of Monkey Crisco 18:16, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Looks like some n00b(s) attempted to make a different POV, but failed to execute it properly. ---Pelargonium MUN (Talk) (Contribs) (Survey!)
• Delete. Pass the methadone . I feel a madness coming on. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 12:27, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
• Whatever. -- Domo,o,jkhrdhyt hnjm e45sm b vn jy b k vmj bj,jk 04:47, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Do I have to say NUKE IT? Come on, you all know I like to vote like that for deletes. Anyways, this article is terribly written. Not worth keeping it. --TrekCaptain 06:04, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Weak. If the voice of the story aged to at least 15 (Oh, yeah, & edit it too.) I'd say keep it.  ~  Happytimes are here!  (talk) (stalk)   03:59, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• All right, I get it, this is another article in a point of view different from the usual encyclopedia one. Two, in fact, bitchily going point-counterpoint just like Spock and McCoy, or perhaps The Fockers. This may be the "method in that madness" that Mn-z cites. To me, though, alternate voices are an excuse for bad writing, for nagging and chest-thumping, for the cheap humor of cut-downs, creating caricatures in order to ridicule them, rather than real humor. Then again, I don't watch cartoons, so maybe this reaches the target audience. But why is an article allowed to start with a link to its own Pee Review? Spıke ¬ 18:46 15-Dec-09

• Keep but perhaps move to the UnBooks space. I thought it was weird and quirky but kind of charming. pillow talk 21:16, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• Strong Keep There are tons of savable lines in this one. I found many parts very funny. Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 17:35, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• conditional keep if this gets cleaned up. --Mn-z 17:56, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep I like the name. FUCK YEAH I AM SO PUNK ROCK! 18:10, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete random and poorly formatted. --Mn-z 19:31, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. - Although famine has been known to eat said babies. -- Kip the DipTalkWorksTreat WHORE! ☃ 19:39, Dec. 14, 2009
• Delete. Spıke ¬ 20:17 14-Dec-09
• Delete. Very bad article by a user who hasn't contributed anything since August 22. ---Pelargonium MUN (Talk) (Contribs) (Survey!)
• Delete. Craptacularly awful. I see it was also signed by --SuperNinja HoboNika 09:10, 22 August 2009 (UTC) - so we know where you live. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 07:17, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Dumbass Jew. -- Domo,o,jkhrdhyt hnjm e45sm b vn jy b k vmj bj,jk 04:59, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• WTF IS THIS CRAP?!? Need I say more? --TrekCaptain 06:06, December 18, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Although, more stories should start with, "Upon the grumbling and growling of Jane's unbelievably flat (and sexy) stomach, she began to wonder why exactly this sexy beast of a body part makes such a fittingly sexy noise.".  ~  Happytimes are here!  (talk) (stalk)   03:59, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. This sucks. This is not only very random, it is poorly written and simply unfunny. User:SeltheWolf

• Savable?.... Saveable?... Saveble? How do you spell that? Is it even a word? Does it matter? Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 18:08, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

I'd say "saveable," the "silent e" remaining to signal that the preceding "a" doesn't change. Spıke ¬ 18:48 15-Dec-09

Well, if you want to do it the American way, you can drop the "e" and write "savable". The British would rather have you writing "saveable" though. However, none of that matters since there is no officially acknowledged authority allowed to prescribe English orthography. English dictionaries should therefore only describe the spelling that is commonly accepted according to observed spelling rules. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) KUN SotM UotM PMotM 02:41, 16 December 2009

rly? wl in dat case im gon talk in txtspk (SMS FTW) FNO (<--dats from nowon) FITE DA SISTIM! pillow talk 17:29, December 18, 2009 (UTC)

• Keep It's actually kind of funny. --Ozymandiaz 17:48, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep. It is funny if you know the history of the IWETHEY group on the Internet. They were opposed to Uncyclopedia and vandalized a lot of pages here. We need this page as well as Digg, Reddit, LiveJournal, Facebook, MySpace, etc. The try harder to be funny means a rewrite not a deletion. They are even quoted here in the Uncyclopedia is the worst article. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:52, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

• I have to object to that. IWETHEY is nowhere near the same level of Digg, MySpace, etc. It doesn't have a Wikipedia article and practically fails UN:CM. In fact, this article up for deletion is the 2nd result on a Google search for IWETHEY. Taking a look at their defunct homepage that looks like it was designed in 1992, I'd say we "need" on article on them as much as we "need" an article on the GNAA. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:48, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Actually Wikipedia cites them three times as a reliable source. Two are articles on SCO and one is a user page. So Wikipedia lists IWETHEY as notable enough to be used as a credible source. Their Forums are down due to a Linux error and they claim to be Linux experts. So they set up a temporary form, but they used to have thousands of Google results before their main forum crashed and as I recall the number of Google hits is a factor. You can see thousands of web pages linking to IWETHEY web sites and forums. This article moved up to number two after their forum crashed last year and Google removed their forum links. Ask Elvis about it, he was the admin that had to deal with them. So it passes the Admins know about them test. Look I admit it can be funnier, but I am not the one to do it, someone else can rewrite it so it is funnier. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 04:53, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

• Keep. Though I wasn't around at the time this happened, I think the article's good enough to keep. ---Pelargonium MUN (Talk) (Contribs) (Survey!)
• It's not the worst thing ever Woody On Fire! Talking Woody Stalking Woody 15:29, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Keep It's pretty funny as is, in my opinion. Pleb KUN Dexter111344 • Complain here • Vote now! 17:23, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

• Delete. We got rid of IWETHEYvandals, now to the main course, which has not been nominated for VFD for 19 whole months. IWETHEY is a consortium of memes with a horrible acronym and a loud template that warns the reader to expect humor. Like Godot, it never arrives. Spıke ¬ 13:43 14-Dec-09
• Delete. This is the article's third nomination. I read through the other two nominations, and the rationale for voting keep was "This is an important part of Uncyclopedia history; IWETHEY is a notable forum whose history is intertwined with ours." Well, fair enough. You've convinced me that this is allowable vanity and that a page with this title should be allowed to exist. But this article is not fucking funny. It's a sophomoric repetition of all the Uncyclopedia memes I'm sick to death of. So let's delete it, and if anyone wants to try again and try harder, be my guest. My two cents. pillow talk 17:49, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. Like above, it's not actually funny. Bit of an insult to Queen's too. I know some quite clever folks who went there. PTQ is funny. This is a load of crap. Myocardialinfarction 20:08, December 14, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. 2005 meme vomit. --Mn-z 17:23, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. See if ED wants it, because it's got no right to hang around here. --Count of Monkey Crisco 00:07, December 16, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete. -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:08, 19 Dec
• Delete. Bell, book and candle. Proceed with the excommunication. --RomArtus Imperator(talk) 15:19, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Don't care. -- Domo,o,jkhrdhyt hnjm e45sm b vn jy b k vmj bj,jk 23:31, December 22, 2009 (UTC)
• Delete or better yet Move "They claim that a Kirsty Alley administration would outlaw Kitten Huffing, which would cause a Temporal paradox that will ultimately enable Elvis to win the Annual Miss Stalin-Look-Alike 2006 contest and abuse his powers to allow SCO to win their lawsuit against IBM over Linux." I'd go for moving it to someone's user space who wants to work on it (see below).     Rabbi WHY??? (shmuesn)  01:19, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

• Loud abstain I'm not going to miss this, but I think this is WJU-type allowable vanity. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 15:13, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

WJU is good writing (despite some overlong titles) about an unremarkable institution. IWETHEY is Us writing about Us, and how we are so darned funny we drive people mad. Behind many double standards is a single standard that varies depending on whether it's Us doing it. Spıke ¬ 17:08 14-Dec-09

• Comment. I just want to remind everyone that UN:CM is a much different policy than Wikipedia:WP:N or Wikipedia:WP:V. On Wikipedia, if it fails N or V, it's deleted, if it passes, it's kept. Simple. But on Uncyclopedia - well, Martial Arts passes UN:CM, and we deleted it. Tapheselachophobia fails UN:CM, and we featured it. The real, true test for whether we want an article here is: does it make me laugh. pillow talk 05:19, December 15, 2009 (UTC)
• Comment Apparently if you want an article gone, this is proof that if you submit it to VFD multiple times that eventually it will be voted for deletion. Though I've countered all points that it isn't notable and I cited Wikipedia links, that Google has 75,000+ hits on it, that the Admins know about it, and that it was considered funny enough to keep twice, that eventually if you get enough people to consider voting to delete it because they don't understand the history about the group or that it was written in 2005. I may have to create a new and updated version after it is deleted and hope others join in to make it funnier. Though it should really be rewritten for modern humor, and written so that even people who don't know the history can find it funny, I feel it will be deleted anyway as the type of humor for this web site has changed from 2005 when the article was written. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 23:41, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

  Either that, or we just weren't very good in 2005. Anyway, like I said, I hope you do rewrite it, regardless of the outcome of this vote. pillow talk 00:19, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

• The problem with persecution theories is that there is usually an easier explanation. I heartily agree that "it should really be rewritten...so that even people who don't know the history can find it funny"--with all comparable Uncyclopedia articles. I didn't find it funny, and you understand! And I too hope you step up, given either outcome of the vote. Spıke ¬ 02:25 16-Dec-09

Oh I will rewrite it. While I didn't start the article I did contribute to it over the years. Many others did write it with me, but they are gone now and moved on to other things. I got a feeling it will be deleted. Then he will lose the history of IWETHEY members vandalizing the article and blanking the page. I think they blanked and vandalized other pages as they usually use anonymous IP addresses and proxy servers. Some of them may have been Anonymous Slashy, Powershot, and other trolls that tried to disrupt our community. They are hacktivists and had an axe to grind with Microsoft and SCO. While they promote Linux and claim to be Linux experts their forum and wiki sites are often down due to Linux issues they cannot resolve. So it has taken a year to recover their data to the phase it is now and they got started in 1995 leaving Infoworld forums to start up their own, so they are tied with Infoworld and some worked for Infoworld and EzBoard. So if I do rewrite it I'll have to explain that type of history for people who don't know it. Avoid the MEMEs, and tie it into the Forums article somehow. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 05:13, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

Once you rewrite it, talk to an admin about restoring the history so we can see the blankings, if you think that's important for the article. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 06:17, December 16, 2009 (UTC)

Yes can some admin please copy it to my User Space so I can edit it and save the blanking evidence? That is if it gets deleted. I am going to rewrite it so it is funnier. I do this for some articles that get deleted but deserve a rewrite. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 22:13, December 16, 2009 (UTC)