N♥m && f♥r. I just hate this user so much. He's inspired too many joke noms in his short stay on Uncyc. Although his Gordon Brown image wasn't bad. —SirSysRq (talk) 20:24, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
Your mom likes it big, hard and fast. J-Shea 19:52, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Why, you god-forsaken little- <This message has been deleted for excessive cussing, name-calling, flaming, and very illeagal pony fights> <Joe SheA, by the way, sucks.> This guy should win Sockpuppeteer, too! Not A Good Username360 00:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Hey, what does the colon button do? J-Shea 06:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
For. I think I did that right... - 66.233.240.67 23:02, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Score: 1 Guys who still wonder WTF happened to Kip.
Nom and For Oh man this guy used to be one of our best contributers and have gotten so much attention of the Cabal admins. Since then he hasn't been block for worth a darn except for FFS and other things. This guy used to get blocked on a regular basis sometimes even more than Cajek. Now I think he lost his touch and therefore very useless. Please Vote for him as UGotY. --Pleb- Sawblade5 [citation needed] (yell|FAQ|I did this) 01:43, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
Nom and For Arguably their finest year to date, Wikia continue to raise the bar on defining what it means to be a Useless Gobshite. My gut feeling is they could be a regular contended for this award, but for me after a slow start to the year Wikia made this award their own. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
For. - I never usually vote on Gobshite awards, but it's rare to see such dedication to gobshitery--Sycamore(Talk) 08:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
For. Outstanding contributions to fail. --UU - natter13:53, Jan 13
Comment don't throw away this award on Wikia, at least give it to a real person, like Jimbo Wales --Mnbvcxz 18:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Are you confusing Wikia with the Wikimedia Foundation? pillow talk 19:12, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Wikia is the company the owns uncyclopedia, right? --Mnbvcxz 19:19, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I think they host us, not own us. At any rate, Jimbo is not associated with them. At least, I don't think he is. pillow talk 19:24, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I thought we were owned by the same people (more or less) who run wikipedia? --Mnbvcxz 19:26, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
No, Wikia is a company set up by Jimbo Wales built around wiki software and helped out by people like our own Sannse. Wikimedia Foundation is a company set up by Jimbo Wales built around wiki software and helped out by people like our own Sannse. Its important to highlight the differences. -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
Hmm. It does seem that Wikimedia and Wikia have common founders and investors. Including Jimbo.[1] However, they're separate projects, and neither of them own us. pillow talk 19:29, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Then who in the name of Oscar Wilde owns this wiki? --Mnbvcxz 19:44, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I don't think anybody owns it. Certainly not the Cabal. That would be silly, because there is no Cabal. pillow talk 19:45, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Ok, then who is responsible for the .wikia.com being in the sites url? --Mnbvcxz 19:48, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
Depends on how you define ownership. Due to the licensing, I believe the author retains the "copyleft" of any contributions. But, I could be wrong. But, that still doesn't answer the question of who has the legal ownership of the wiki itself. --Mnbvcxz 05:54, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
As far as I know, the code is open source, and all the contributions are owned by the contributors. So that would make it owned, basically, by no one. The only thing that requires ownership is the servers; Wikia owns them, but we could move. pillow talk 06:11, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
I believe Wikia does the uncyclopedia.wikia.com site name. Also, I believe "Uncyclopedia" is a non-profit entity owned by Wikia, right? Despite the fact that the content itself is owned by the authors, and licensed under a copyleft Creative Commons license. As for moving, I think we also create mirrors (and if fact, there are some independent mirror sites floating around) without actually moving off of wikia. --Mnbvcxz 06:53, 22 January 2009 (UTC)
Forum:Some links to Uncyc forums of the past. Uncyclopedia WAS a non profit site. Wikia then bought the domain name from the sites founder without the knowledge of the community. They then added links to their other wikis which run adverts, and then changed our name to deceive their advertisers. All of this was done against the will of the Uncyc community. Considering how Uncyc is being used by Wikia now, I think it's a stretch to consider us a non-profit site. We clearly make money for Wikia. Try asking them how much. ;) MrNFork you! 12:53, Jan 24
Theoretically, if we left Wikia, could we sue Wikia for violating the copyleft of our contributions by using them in a for profit manner? --Mnbvcxz 20:57, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
Nom and for leaving the wikia. If that isn't gobshitery, I don't know what is. Also, she pretended to be a boy for several months. --Mnbvcxz 15:32, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
The name's Gobshite, Useless Gobshite - [15:54 13 January 2009] YYettie
Erm, I believe you already voted, Yettie. Gobshite.pillow talk 05:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
What? No, I didn't vote for Joe, I was merely concurring. - [11:03 17 January 2009] YYettie
But there is a 'for' picture next to your concurificationism. --J-Shea 11:06, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Mmm...Not A Good Username360 added that. And besides if I was making a vote, it would not be indented. - [11:16 17 January 2009] YYettie
Against. Acorrding to the thesaurus: "Concur=Agree". What other kind of person would put "I agree" on a nomination and not be voting for said person, then get upset when someone else thinks that said person forgot the For. template? Answer: A gobshite, however, YTTE comes off as a useful gobshite, and his sin is not a big one. I shall NOT condemn/vote for such a user. There are more deserving gobshites this year. SirNotA Good Username360KUN 18:03, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment but she doesn't know what gender she is, she left the wiki, and sense she sorta came back, most of her posts have been about confusing people about her gender. --Mnbvcxz 00:03, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Comment not really, in my opinion, one cannot win UGotY and N00b Of the Month. UGotM, maybe, but not UGotY. SirNotA Good Username360KUN 00:34, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
Well, I never won NotM. You know why? Because Uncyclopedia is the WORST. pillow talk 19:34, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
I can think of nobody more deserving of Doctor Skullthumper of the Year and i guess he should get this too!!! --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 02:21, January 7, 2010 (UTC)
Nom and For. No user and I mean NO USER on uncyclopedia fits the requirements of UGotY more than him. USELESS. GOBSHITE. GOATSE. I do like him, though. SIREFREDDMOOSHAAMUSE ME • 07:32 • Saturday, 2-01-2010
Nom & For. "Oh, hey guys, I'm back. Ha ha, I'm getting banned. I'll just squeeze out a feature and... okay, I'm leaving. Oh, hey, I'm back. Oh, look, I didn't do anything. Except get banned. And brag that the whole Pee Review system still exists in my userspace." Christ, man. This guy is so unable to shit or get off the pot that I'm pretty sure he just squats over the damn thing. pillow talk 19:27, January 5, 2010 (UTC)
For. because for some reason, a lot of pages that his bot touched ended up on VFD. That has to mean something. --Wilytank can be a pain in the ass. 22:35, January 6, 2011 (UTC)
Score: +12 sorcerers, mages, warlocks, and related magic-users
For plaguing my 2010 with the relentless assertion that "it" was done by some particular actor. pillow talk 02:08, January 1, 2011 (UTC)
For Dexter111344's standards of quality far exceed that any Uncyclopedian I know. His efforts to improve the site by writing hilarious articles, fighting vandalism, cleaning up the cruft, and generally being a pleasant fellow outdo those from any other Uncyclopedian. Despite being here for four years, Dexter111344 (or "Snugglebunny" as those of us from UnSkype know him) has given Uncyclopedia his very best in 2010, and for that I must give my vote to him for Useless Gobshite of the Year. Congratulations Snuglebunny, you've earned it. Let his inevitable winning of this award inspire us all to not suck more than him. --Hotadmin4u69[TALK]07:12 Jan 2 2011
For That thing EMC said about him sucking. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at08:18, Sunday 02 January 2011 -
FUCK this guy - —rc(t) 22:11, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
For That thing Colin AYB said about that thing EMC said about him sucking - —The preceding unsigned comment was added byTodd Lyons (talk • contribs) 22:11, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
What a dick. - Drama 22:11, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Nom and for. Practically everything this guys does is annoying. I know he has annoyed the hell out of me pretty much since I joined; something tells me I can't be the only one... 1234~02:30, 1 January 2011
For I remember this one time when ChiefjusticeDS deleted a featured article for no reason. Then after I banned him for this infringement, he went and banned me! He totally deserves this award. -- BrigadierGeneralSirZombiebaron 19:04, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
For Banned me for nothing one time. --ChiefjusticeXBox 22:55, January 3, 2011 (UTC)
For Good humored, and wasn't that upset at my article making fun of him. He don't take no shit from nobody! -- 23:42, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
No, he is NOT gay. He is actually Girl, like she always say. And there can be a little change that she is lesbian. But we are not sure. Cat the Colourful (Feed Me!!!)Leave me alone... 05:56, January 10, 2011
For He told me that he hated me on IRC :'( And then he stole my puppy. --Dame 13:59, January 13, 2011 (UTC)
For. He stole the word Gobshite from licking rural irish latrines and made it his own- the dirty big eejit -give him the yeast infection- in hourly nipple injections, for, as Richard Harris and Oscar Wilde were so fond of saying "Judge not and you shall rarely risk a Rhinoceros horn reaming" yours in wikijesus -- ⦿⨦⨀ Phrage(talk) 05:31, January 14, 2011 (UTC)
For. He gave my cat AIDS! Oh Hamish... Smuff[kthnxbai] 11:44, January 30, 2011 (UTC)
Nom&For I'll edit whatever I want to! She couldn't even explain to me where babies come from and the birds and the bees. I had to reference Puppy's book (thanks, Al) → I am greatSoup? 23:15 3-Jan-11 ←
Om nom nom. There, I nominate her, her pink templates are pink. Smuff[kthnxbai]20:20, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
Nom Yeah, I know how I'm being a huge hypocrite by breaking the very rule that I was enforcing (drawing Mordillo's wrath in the process), but hey, all the more reason for you to vote me as the biggest asshole of the year. --Scofield 15:28, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
Invalid For I'm attempting to edit this section, but it has no effect!!!! --—John Lydon 15:35, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
I find this amusing. --ChiefjusticeXBox 19:39, January 4, 2011 (UTC)
Nom Because he just joined a few months ago, and he seems promising. He also thinks of himself as the next leader. --Oldie 23:58, January 17, 2011 (UTC)
For.Thanks and all, but why am I nominated? -- 00:15, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
You are a Maniac. And you are a McPee. What else is there to know? A fun user, so I give a Spiritual Abstain. Aleister 00:18 18 1 '11
That's reassuring. Might as well get some votes too. -- 00:34, January 18, 2011 (UTC)
Invalid nomination as nominator was a sock that belonged to Maniac mpee. Even for this award, we don't approve of cheating.--- TALKWhat's it like to be a heretic? 00:31, January 26, 2011 (UTC)
Shame, he was soo... Useless... -- 03:18, January 28, 2011 (UTC)
I think she deserves it this year. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 00:17, January 1, 2012 (UTC) HOW COULD I FORGET ROMAN DOG BIRD??? ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 22:08, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
For. Yea, she's good. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 00:27, January 31, 2012 (UTC) Nevermind. For some reason I thought this was for photo-chopper of the year. --Sir Oliphaunte (განხილვა) 00:29, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
Support. This user has been an ongoing pain when it comes to common interaction with the community, and probably could use a thorough thwacking. -— Isarra (talk) 23:23, January 31, 2012 (UTC)
Nom + For More useless, he gives uncyclopedia a bad name as evident with the amount of usernames designed to insult him. ~SirFrosty(Talk to me!) 00:48, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
spiritual self-for: ponyfag, incredibly worthless as an admin and user, and not even remotely funny. BUT AT LEAST I'M NOT DR. SKULLTHUMPER. --Roman Dog Bird 10:38, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
I've voted for this guy on UotY a couple times. I realized far too late that I forgot the "G" both times. Holy FUCK FOR. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 15:54, January 1, 2012 (UTC)
Yes! Yes! A thousand times yes! All of the awards might soon ascend into bandwagons, and at the risk of joining those early I'm holding my votes, but I've got to vote for Roman Bird Dog for this one. I'll never get back the hours of wasted time I've spent laughing at his battles with the 92 vandal (spriritual For. the 92 vandal, one of my favorite people around here), you owe me that time back RDB, and I want it back now. Aleister 22:17 New Years Day
For. Because he's a stupid gay nigger faggot and I hope he get some venereal disease. He's also the monkey king, but that's unrelated. -RAHB 03:05, January 5, 2012 (UTC)
They have managed to break so much this past year that it's actually pretty funny. Add to that the things that they've broken further by trying to fix, they actually make me feel competent by comparison. Which in this case isn't even saying much, oddly. 1234~22:33, 1 January 2012
While they certainly deserve this award, I don't intend to waste my vote on them. I'm sure that's why they've been screwing up so much this year, to win this award. Well, fuck 'em. —SirSocky(talk)(stalk)GUNSotMUotMPMotMUotYPotMWotM22:09, 6 January 2012