Uncyclopedia:Useless Gobshite of the Month/Walter Humala

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

edit Walter Humala (TalkContribs (del)EditcountBlock (rem-lst-all)LogsGroups)

Score: +6 manjii/swasthyas/not nazi ones
  • Nom and For. For the swastika in the sig and other bullshit, as placing the FFS in my user page without actually nominating me, just as a way to retaliate my vote for him at that page. If you admins are too shy to "censor" this moron, let's just show our love to him. Yet I don't know if he fits the UGotM conditions, that is, if he was banned last month. At least his name doesn't appear in the block log. -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 21:14, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
  • For: I've hated this guy all my life. Isn't he on probation or something? --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 22:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)\
  • For.Per his sig and his idiotic user page et cetera. ~Jewriken.GIF 20:56, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • For.Hammers and Sickles are one thing. Swastikas are another. At least communism has some moral value in it.--User:Zerotrousers/sig 23:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • I think I speak for all of my fellow Jews. --TKF 20:58, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • For User:Wehpudicabok/sig 22:54, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Notice: All whining moved to the talk talk page. -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 19:11, 12 April 2007 (UTC)


(Discussion about the candidate Walter Humala, hero of the free expression, bashed by the greedy jews and their puppets) -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 19:10, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

  • Hammers and Sickles are one thing. Swastikas are another. At least communism has some moral value in it.--User:Zerotrousers/sig 23:02, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: this is an issue we could discuss for hours, but yeah, so be it, we have a consensus on swastikas. -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 18:43, 10 April 2007 (UTC)
  • A nasty and unfunny one, for instance. Look, if you could make it clear that you are a joke-nazi - I mean, by clever irony and not just by clumsy copying Tom Mayfair's page changing "communism" to "nazism" - maybe we could even laugh with you. But the unchanged swastika... If you want to keep on this joke, try to change it for an Iron Cross, for example. Or use the Libertarian National Socialist Green Party [www.nazi.org] swastika, one thing that is full of involuntary humor. Some taboos are worthy of being kept - that's civilization, kid. -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 19:08, 11 April 2007 (UTC)
Actually, I was referring to the widespread Jewish hate of people named Walter. I have no problem with the whole Nazi getup. --T.K.F. 01:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
All right guys, I've swapped the swastika with this Image:Winlogo.png -- Emperor Walter HumalaNazi Swastika God save him!(God exists?) Crystal Clear app korganizer | wanna Talk? 02:39, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • First: it's still in your sig. Second: accept this, you've done shit, you will pay for it. -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 02:57, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Comment I personally believe that this award should only go to those who disrupt the site and if we censor, we'd have to censor articles like niggerlodeon. Have faith in the site process of getting rid of unfunny content to work and if something offends you, read the content disclaimer. --Hrodulf 03:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for not taking jokes too seriously. -- Emperor Walter HumalaNazi Swastika God save him!(God exists?) Crystal Clear app korganizer | wanna Talk? 04:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
This might sound like the usual Jewish ranting but think about the following: I cannot, in good faith, after my grandparents are both graduates of Auschwitz - accept some Nazi related jokes. I'm not talking about the usual Hitler jokes, the usual anti-semitism in the whole Jewish series, I don't give a damn about those. But when I see your user page which has, in my eyes, nothing but a huge swastika in the past and now a "I Smell a Jew" picture and has the marvelous come and join our great camps! forgive me for not laughing. ~Jewriken.GIF 08:31, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Let's try a practical example on you. What would you think about a page of someone pretending to be a pedophile with actual pedophilia pictures? As I stated before, there are taboos that should not be broken. -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 08:41, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
That's not a good example because those pictures are illegal in most countries. Of course, displaying Nazi symbols is illegal in some countries, so putting those on the English Uncyclopedia could create some legal issues for people in France, Germany or Austria . . . this sort of thing is complicated. I'm not supporting what he's doing, I'm just pointing out all the stuff we have that's offensive to blacks, and it seems hypocritical to get angry about the stuff offensive to jews, when as I mentioned we have niggerlodeon. All of that being said, this nazi stuff seems mostly unfunny and probably is vfd fodder. But that doesn't mean that nazi stuff, per se, should be off limits. Otherwise like I said, niggerlodeon would have to be deleted. --Hrodulf 15:58, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
So what? We also have many articles satirizing Jewish people. Making fun of black stereotypes is a little different from being a member of the KKK, don't you think so? -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 00:15, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Wait, we have Hitler jokes? --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:36, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Modus, my dear court jester, can't you tell the difference between writing a shock article on Nazism and impersonating a nazi? Of course we know this kid is not a real nazi. But that's just a question of decency, as long he is not capable of doing something funny about it - and by so making crystal-clear he's not a nazi. See the pedophilia example I talked above. For me, that's the same thing. -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 19:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
Just trying to lighten the mood. Look, my opinion is; he's a moron for putting that symbol there. I see it as, in an odd way, a good thing. It's like he's put on a shirt that says "I'm with stupid" and the arrow is pointing up. Granted, I'd prefer he didn't have a symbol of hate in his sig, but my soup is boiling over and I've lost my train of thought. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:33, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
I've removed the swastika from his sig on the grounds that it is a jerkish thing to display symbols of hate that serve no satirical purpose. Now, we can do one of two things: argue incessantly about whether I have the jurisdiction to have acted so, or just forget about it. I suggest the latter. —rc (t) 03:00, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
I'm with you, Murphy. But there's still one thing to do: crowning him as the Useless Gobshite of the Month! -- herr doktor needsAgear Rocket [scream!] 04:13, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Final Solution I have a proposal for stopping threats on my subpages:
    • I'll remove all shity NAZI stuff from my userpage (although nazi terms were added by Tom Mayfair)
    • Please keep the swastika in my "Best sig", instead I'll start using a "/sig2" without swastika from this point.
    • this is for having a history of my shameful actions on the uncyclopedia. thanks --Emperor Walter Humala 00:29, 14 April 2007 (UTC)
Good idea. However, to make sure your not a real Nazi, take off the header of Final Solution. We all know what that means...--User:Zerotrousers/sig 01:10, 25 April 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools