Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/bill o'reilly

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

edit bill o'reilly

...OSCAR WILDE RULEZ! U are a total CRAPHOLE. 13:05, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Humour: 0 The humour in it didn't quite catch me. I see what you were going for but the angle of attack didn't quite suit the concept. There wasn't any part I laughed at, and I thought the humour was tried for too hard. The complete 'nothing' on the page just didn't grab any laughes. I suggest going over the introduction, body and conclusion and expanding it. It can be as long as you want, if its cleverly written. Maybe make the flow of the article better as well. When you read it out loud, the article sounds broken and choppy. The ending was a bit predictable as well. Maybe tweak it around a little to add an element of 'something'. It would make the article more appealing and funner to read.
Concept: 0 The concept has been done many times before. In fact, we have hundreds of articles exactly the same as yours. The complete non existance of your article really dosnt add much originality or creativity. Try expanding the topic into something more broad. I jut don't think the idea captured the aim of the concept.
Prose and formatting: 0 The 'absolutly nothing' of your article is pretty gramaticaly sound, but the title leaves something to be desired. I think it's someones name, and that means proper nouns need to be capitalized. You should just take time when you create a page, to check over the title. Make sure it's the way you want it. I suggest going over your article with a spell check as well, make sure it's polished and everything. The extra time can make the difference.
Images: 0 This raises a question, are there no images on the page, or is it nothing but images? An image of absolutly nothing. This could very well be a different style on its own. I can't say it compliments the article, because it is the article. And if the article is the image, than the image needs to be expanded, polished and gone over until you think it's up to standards. Maybe get an image of something, to compliment your nothing.
Miscellaneous: 0 average of your scores.
Final Score: 0 I think you need to spend a bit more time focusing on the article itself. Expand the introduction, body and conclusion. If it is cleverly written with the right changes, it could make it's way to VFH. Although this will be mostly impossible since if you expanded the page 100% you would still have nothing. So nothing is what you will always have in this article. If this is the case, what did you expect to get out of a review? If you need any help with formating or ideas or how to pull your head out of your ass, see HTBFANJS
Reviewer: --Saleenmustang fuentfue Saleenmustang My Talk : My Awards 13:26, 10 June 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects