I used to not like this article as much as my other works, but after rereading it, I think its probably one of the funniest works of random humor I've ever done. So, tell me otherwise so I can revert to my earlier assessment. ;) --THINKER 21:45, 13 June 2007 (UTC)
Humour:
8
Pretty funny, but as usual, I can't really think of how to improve that. Sorry.
Concept:
8
It's an interesting anachronistic concept, although not a particularly easy one to write an entertaining article about.
Prose and formatting:
9
Well formatted all round
Images:
8
The images are pretty good, but not particularly funny.
Miscellaneous:
5
I have to mark it down here because the above categories do not reflect the fact that I didn't really find the article all that interesting, and yes, it is rather random. :)
Final Score:
38
Good overall, but I think it's missing the spark required for VFH.
Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 03:38, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
