Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Worst Article Ever (2nd Review)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review
Revision as of 17:49, December 24, 2009 by Ptok-Bentoniczny (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

--Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 07:33, December 22, 2009 (UTC)

FAQ

edit Worst Article Ever

Very close to winning VFH but sucked major dick at the final votes, so I'm going to fix it up. Please give me help to fix up this article without changing the concept. Indepth please, thanks. Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 22:31, December 21, 2009 (UTC)

Also, people have edited alot of things in this article, to note the tough guy and the old guy are my pictures.--Eye 4WILLExplode 3YOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 09:46, December 23, 2009 (UTC)

Wait... it almost won in VFH? LOL. ☃☃☃☃☃☃☃☃ 09:53 December 23
Humour: 8 Jokes are easy to understand. Typical Neo's kid that tries to write something. Misspellings are just sou kewl and made in the adequate numbers. You included Chuck Norris what is just necessary in that cases. Well,, you might bowl out lalalalalalalalala section and put some random Rolling the head on the keyboard or how it's named. It's funny if you know what's going on. Retarded, infantile but funny. You may also consider adding some fake links to kewl pages ;p
Concept: 8 Not too original, but let it be.
Prose and formatting: 10 Prose and formation is just PERFECT! But you may consider adding some broken formating also commonly done by the noobs
Images: 9 I laughed hardly at the fat man. But you may consider some more random articles, maybe something with broken link?
Miscellaneous: 8.8 Well done. I salute you sir.
Final Score: 43.8 Hi-score
Reviewer: PoliszSir Ptok-BentonicznyPisz tutaj KUN 17:49, December 24, 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects