Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Worst 100 Ways To Kill Sarah Connor

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


edit Worst 100 Ways To Kill Sarah Connor

I found this old VFD survivor from 2010, that the initial author Rio GT has long since disowned and didn't finish. I rewrote a slight majority of it trying to get it to be more relavent and less repetitious. I look forwards to your suggestions, even if it's just to send this screaming metal death trap back to the VFD junkyard. Irritable of contents (talk) 19:59, June 16, 2016 (UTC)

Added 19:59, June 16, 2016 (UTC)
[[Template:Review request/{{#time: ymd|19:59, June 16, 2016 (UTC)]]

edit Reviewed

Reviewer details

A little bit about the reviewer



How and why is it funny? Any suggestions?




How good is an idea behind the article?



Prose and Formatting

How good does it look and how well does it read?




How are the images? Are they relevant, with good quality and formatting?




The article's overall quality - that indefinable something.




An overall summation of the article.


--WeatherUnderground (talk) 20:27, February 2, 2017 (UTC)
Very funny article with some rather original ideas. I like the idea of deconstructing the illogical nature of an action film. I must admit though, that I didn't read the whole thing. If this could be trimmed down to like 50 or 30 ways to kill poor Sarah, it would be much better - some the ideas are so far fetched that they make no sense, and I think the reader gets the message halfway through the list. After that, it's just repeating jokes. Regardless of this, I think it is a laugh to read the totally obvious things, that the filmmakers never thought of. Good work!
This was a Pee Review by --WeatherUnderground (talk) 20:27, February 2, 2017 (UTC)

Author: Are you satisfied by this review?
Click here, if yes
Request a new one, if no!


Personal tools