Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Womp Rat
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
The never-ending HELP! plea...
Funnybony 07:23, January 22, 2010 (UTC)
- I'm a quater of the way through. Will resume in a few hours. ~
05:46, Jan 30, 2010
- Oops, one of my noob blunders. I'm such a noob. I really didn't know that saving it like this puts it in "reviewed". Really, really sorry. But I'll finish by today, I promise. ~ 05:49, Jan 30, 2010
I think this is sort of well-written, and reminds me of a shorter and less in-depth unidentified man in green firing turret, which you should probably read. I think it's pretty good as it is and there's nothing that I don't really like. I chuckled about twice, which is good considering the length of your article. The only improvement I can suggest is to maybe develop your concept more, lengthen the article and have more jokes.
Nature and Appearance
Habitat and use
|Concept:||7||This sounds like an article that primarily uses "repetition", which is not that original. While that's not bad, and I can think of at least one article that got featured solely on the joke of repetition, it's also, in my opinion, not er...outstanding?
|Prose and formatting:||8.5||Prose is good, and I didn't see any errors. So...uh, if I have to find something to say, maybe too many hyphens? I think people don't normally put hyphens in words like intergalactic, but I could be mistaken.
|Images:||6||Most images are ok but not especially funny.
|Miscellaneous:||7.1||The prose is nice and non-random, the kind of article that I like. Overally, this article is ok but it might be a bit short. There are no really bad parts but some parts could use more funny. Note that scoring is arbitrary.|
|Final Score:||35.6||If you need further help or clarification, you can always talk to me on my talk page.|
|Reviewer:||~11:33, Jan 30, 2010|