Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Trade Your Family's Only Cow For Magic Beans (2)
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
I made some changes so it needs re-reviewing. --20:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
--20:11, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
|Humour:||8||Not bad at all! I particularly liked the near-savage references to the reader as an “idiot”, followed by the quick cover up by the bean seller, that was well done. The “Bullshit” link, although I have seen it done a multitude of time was played out nicely. I would say my favourite section was “The Beans of a Thousand Uses”, and using “surprise sex” as one of the links, well done, nicely played. I can’t think of anything to criticise in this article humour wise, but the only reason I gave an 8 was because it wasn’t exactly hysterical.|
|Concept:||9||Very decent concept, clearly inspired by “Jack and the Beanstalk”. You played the concept quite nicely, following the expected roles. I admired how well thought through this article was, definitally deserves that 9|
|Prose and formatting:||8||Gramitically, no complaints. Your article flowed from one section to another with almost possessed ease, with the set-up, and the punch lines rolled in well. I will gladly say you rolled everything, very good. The links were all blue, which was, once again, good. There is only one thing I can think of in this article… add some more categories. Once this page goes far enough down featured, it will come to the point people will not bump into it as often|
|Images:||7||This is the category that needs the most work. The opening picture of the Cabal was not bad at all, setting a decent tone of the article and drawing in the attentioun. The greeting (“Why hello there!”) was very nice, almost setting up the believable tone of the article.
My criticism lies with the next picture of the beans. While I am not afraid to admit it was a good picture (the serving suggestion suggesting you eat the magic beans?!) it doesn’t make sense with the text next to it, seeing as to how they are Heinz baked beans… with glitter added. The picture shows what I think are just typical, average, boring baked beans. I don’t think it would take too much time to obtain glitter and beans and see what they look like in photos.
The Top Hat picture honestly did not make a heaping of sense, but I will not object too much to its presence. The text in the article could be changed a bit if you are going to insist on keeping the hat.
Just one small point I think you might want to try, try putting images on the centre, the left, AND the right. At the time, the right side of the article looks a bit crowded.
|Miscellaneous:||8||Avg’d as per Pee Review guidelines|
|Final Score:||40||You do have bit of work to do on this otherwiase outstanding article.
Get those out of the way, and I will honestly vote this article for featured. Good luck!
|Reviewer:||Warm Regards, Javascap|