Also, if you just average the other scores in the miscellaneous section, I'll split your head open with a pointy rock. I want the miscellany of my article properly analyzed, dammit. --TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 18:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I'll review this, whilst waiting enjoy Noel with this coupon. — SirSycamore (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm really sorry TKF, I've had a think and I don't think I'm going to be able to do a really good reveiw with this article. — SirSycamore (talk) 09:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, so apparently TKF put this up here, and then someone reviewed this and the score was pretty positive, and now I'm all like, sweet, second opinion please? - P.M., WotM, & GUN,Sir Led Balloon(Tick Tock)(Contribs) 15:51, Aug 27
Decent humour. Not ridiculously awesome, not eye-scratchingly horrible. I'm not sure how much you can do with it before it just starts getting old. You had some really good moments, like the beginning of the Unicorns section, but then by Rainbows pulling the same exact thing with Leprechauns kind of made it lose its appeal. I found the ending a bit anticlimactic. You could have done without those last two lines, I think.
Everyone's always up for striking fear into the hearts of children. I like the concept, ehm...not much else to day.
Prose and formatting:
You were consistent with the voice of the narrator the entire time, which helps make it flow fairly smooth. The paragraphs are a bit short for my taste, but like I said, I don't know how much you could do with this before the reader gives up and finds a better article. Overall, the prose/formatting is perfectly fine to me, this is easy to read and transitions pretty well.
The images are exactly what you're talking about, and the captions reiterate the section. Just what images are for. Average score; there's nothing wrong with them, they just didn't make me explode from laughter.