Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:So Serious?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m ("That Rick Avery link pissed me off" isn't my idea of constructive criticism)
m (booking in)
Line 9: Line 9:
 
:::I'm really sorry TKF, I've had a think and I don't think I'm going to be able to do a really good reveiw with this article. {{user:sycamore/sig2}} 09:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 
:::I'm really sorry TKF, I've had a think and I don't think I'm going to be able to do a really good reveiw with this article. {{user:sycamore/sig2}} 09:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
 
::::Ok, so apparently TKF put this up here, and then someone reviewed this and the score was pretty positive, and now I'm all like, sweet, second opinion please? - {{User:TheLedBalloon/sig}} <small><small>15:51, Aug 27</small></small>
 
::::Ok, so apparently TKF put this up here, and then someone reviewed this and the score was pretty positive, and now I'm all like, sweet, second opinion please? - {{User:TheLedBalloon/sig}} <small><small>15:51, Aug 27</small></small>
  +
  +
{{User:Under user/book review}}
  +
  +
Actually, it's not a mug o' tea this time, but a small glass o' reviewin' strength port, but the sentiment's the same. --{{User:Under_user/sig3}} <small><font color="navy"><i>20:45, Oct 29</i></font></small>
   
 
{{Pee Review Table
 
{{Pee Review Table

Revision as of 20:45, October 29, 2008

FAQ

Why?:So Serious?

Hey! Review! A collab between be and TLB, so it must be at least Pop Secret good.

Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:10, 18 August 2008 (UTC)

Also, if you just average the other scores in the miscellaneous section, I'll split your head open with a pointy rock. I want the miscellany of my article properly analyzed, dammit. --Littleboyonly TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK Oldmanonly 18:11, 18 August 2008 (UTC)
I'll review this, whilst waiting enjoy Noel with this coupon. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 20:41, 24 August 2008 (UTC)
I'm really sorry TKF, I've had a think and I don't think I'm going to be able to do a really good reveiw with this article. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 09:35, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Ok, so apparently TKF put this up here, and then someone reviewed this and the score was pretty positive, and now I'm all like, sweet, second opinion please? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:51, Aug 27
UUtea A big mug o' reviewin' strength tea? Why, that must mean this article
is being reviewed by:
UU - natter UU Manhole
(While you're welcome to review it as well, you might like to consider helping someone else instead).
(Also, if the review hasn't been finished within 24 hours of this tag appearing, feel free to remove it or clout UU athwart the ear'ole).

Actually, it's not a mug o' tea this time, but a small glass o' reviewin' strength port, but the sentiment's the same. --UU - natter UU Manhole 20:45, Oct 29

Humour:
Concept:
Prose and formatting:
Images:
Miscellaneous:
Final Score: Not reviewed yet
Reviewer:
Not reviewed yet!
Review now
Personal tools
projects