Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Save the mooses?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


edit Why?:Save the mooses?

Does it suck? If so, how much? Should I be shot, and if so, with what sort of gun?  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 00:24 Aug 29, 2007

I'll have a go at this one, although by rights it should be STM. Still...

Humour: 8 Good stuff. Like the stuff about moose spirituality and the menu method in particular
Concept: 9 Inspired - where did you get that idea? ;-)
Prose and formatting: 8 Fine enough, although for me the lack of consistency with the pluralisation grates a tad (but I am the type that happens to). If you've started with Mooses, I think it would feel better to stick with Mooses as your plural throughout.
Images: 9 There are some, they fit, they work, they're fine. If I'm being picky, the steam powered moose doesn't quite look right (I know a steam powered moose isn't right, but the pic doesn't look, oh, you know...), but it's still fine.
Miscellaneous: 10 A møøse once bit my sister
Final Score: 44 Yeah, like it. Mind you, you should still be shot. With a gonne. But in a fleshy part where it will heal quickly. I've been watching too many violent films lately.
Reviewer: --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 10:34, 14 September 2007 (UTC)
I'll break the laws of grammar and go for Mooses throughout! Oh, and I'll have to see about that steam-powered moose. I get what you mean. It's supposed to be stupid-looking, which it is, but you're right, something's... off. Shame this thing can't be on VFH, everyone'll see it as a STM ego type thing. Bonus points for referencing Monty Python and Terry Pratchett in the same pee review.  Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize  writings  SU&W) 19:08 Sep 14, 2007
Personal tools