Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Isn't there a toilet in the woods? (quick)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


edit Why?:Isn't there a toilet in the woods?

Although this was reviewed by Gerry already, I've tweaked up some of the issues he pointed out and I'm resubmitting it for a quick review. He said, and I agree, that this article may polarize readers yuky doody style. So a quickie would be nice.

Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey Pant-hoot here. 21:05, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

Humour: 10 Starts out slow, and then builds to beautiful crescendo. Fucking classic.
Concept: 10 Wonderful idea, can't believe you're the first to think of it
Prose and formatting: 10 Wonderfully written, perfect tone
Images: 10 The pictures are quite simplistic, but the captions make them.
Miscellaneous: 10 Great Article, one of the best I've seen in a long time
Final Score: 50 Holy Shit, feature this Fucker!!
Reviewer: --WhySoSerious 22:27, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

"What the fuck" was much funnier than "what the hell". Who ruined the article? ~~Rascal

Feel free to edit it back if you feel it's better that way: personally, I don't have a preference. Also, if you liked it (since you apparently read it) go vote for it on Vote for Highlight. --Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey Pant-hoot here. 18:19, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Me? No way. I let the author do whatever he wants with it, I don't care. I just thought it was way funnier before. The word "hell" just doesn't seem to convey the feeling of surprise in the same way. ~~Rascal
Fair enough, but as I said, go here if you liked it. --Mr. Monkey Sockmonkey Pant-hoot here. 18:52, 6 September 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools