Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Why?:Be Emo? (2nd Review)
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Did some changes and want a second look now to finish it up. In-depth please! Thanks09:13, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
- Oh, hi Tagstit! I am going to review your article soon! How do you like my Pee Template? You can answer here or on my Talk Page. Thanks! :)
--User:Skate1168/sig 22:05, 3 February 2009 (UTC)
Looks good bud! A bit rude but if it works for you than keep it ! --00:56, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Don't worry I thought about it last night and I think I am going to change it. :)
--User:Skate1168/sig 17:11, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I changed it to something a lot better! Hope you like it! :)
--User:Skate1168/sig 17:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- I do like it! It moves :) always a plus 23:40, 4 February 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! :D
--User:Skate1168/sig 01:30, 5 February 2009 (UTC)
| PEE REVIEW IN PROGRESS!
Skate1168 is reviewing your article. Please give him some time. If there no review in 5 days (at the very most), you should remove this template.
|Humour:||9||The humor in this article is very good, even though the article was also written in a sad way. One example of the good humor in this article is :
|Concept:||9||This has a good concept to write about especially for a Why:? article. This area also could not be critiqued.|
|Prose and formatting:||8||There were no grammar or spelling mistakes in this article and everything was laid out in an excellent manner, making the article appear more |
|Images:||10||The images were great, even though they were not super colorful (but seriously, it is an article about emos. They are not supposed to be colorful), and the captions were hilarious. One example of the hilarious captioning was:
|Miscellaneous:||9||This is the average rating of this article. This article could get a ten for this score if the prose comment was accounted for.|
|Final Score:||45||This is a good article, because I enjoyed this article even though I not really into ”How To” or ”Why?” articles, although I am now!
|Reviewer:||--User:Skate1168/sig 00:30, 8 February 2009 (UTC)|