First review is here: Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/Ussher. I didn't do that much to it, I fleshed out the evolution sub-section by about a paragraph and changed the pics. --Mnbvcxz 05:29, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
I wasn't originally going to review this but since this has been on here for a while I decided to finally do it. I am not too familiar on the subject matter but I will just say what I thought. There are definitely some funny parts I think, but it isn't laugh out loud. It is very dull in many parts and is a bit difficult to read. There are some good parts like in the history the quote was hilarious but maybe its just the subject matter is a bit boring. It is a really good article though despite the topic, and I think its at its max potential.
The concept is really what I think hurt this thing. There aren't many ways to really go with this. The concept is what it is and there are many better choices. Despite that, it was a bit funny for an article I started reading expecting to be very bored.
Prose and formatting:
The prose was very strong and I saw absolutely no errors. The article itself is very strong is well presented. No changes should be made here.
There are three. All are pretty good, nothing to go into hysterics about but they do help tell what you are saying in a way. They fit well for the article too and keep it from being a wall of text. One about gradualism that isn't a cartoon might help.
I personally found this to be kinda boring, but I don't think there was much you could've done to make it better. Lots of your other stuff is way funnier so it is no doubt the topic's fault. It is such a good score because of how it is presented. Besides that good luck!
Thanks for the review.--Mnbvcxz 06:45, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Stupidest review I have done I am sorry about that. =/ --Tagstit 06:50, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
I would probably agree with your review. The article is at its maximum potential, and it still is a hair on the boring side. I did change the last image, the cartoon was a little off for the tone. My only issue would be that your concept score was probably low, but it was offset by a high formatting score. I would have probably given it 7-8 concept, 7-8 formatting.--Mnbvcxz 08:02, 15 January 2009 (UTC)