Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:ZLaSh/Game of Life
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
ZLaSh 19:36, 21 January 2009 (UTC)
|Humour:||2||Um? No really? "Um" being my overriding emotion on this one. Maybe you are doing something really clever here and I'm totally missing it. Sorry if I am. You are talking about this right? I guess the joke is that there is not really much to this?|
|Concept:||3||It's obvious that you have put a lot of effort into this. It is really neat how you have managed to recreate the effect in the wiki. It must have taken you ages to get all the links working right... Do all the links actually work right? The problem is that, well... It's kinda pointless? Maybe more of an explanation of what is going on for those who are not familiar with the actual game might help...|
|Prose and formatting:||6||I'm sure it's possible to make the main page look a bit nicer. The prose you do have is OK, but there is so little of it I can really mark much higher.|
|Images:||0||No images=zero points. Sorry, that's just that. Surely you could manage one on the main page?|
|Final Score:||13.8||You know this has been one of the hardest reviews I have done, cos I really don't know what to say. It's a clever thing you have done here, I'm just not sure it's suitible to be in the main space. Our other games have a humour element to them (as we are a humour wiki) but I struggled to find any here. Again I apologise if I am totally missing the point... My recommendation would be to leave this in your userspace. It is kinda cool, I'm just not sure it's suitable for the wiki. Now you could (if you wanted) make this humorous by providing a commentary for each of the states. Maybe based on insulting the reader for the fact that they are still bothering to play the game maybe? Not sure...
Anyway... I'm no expert in games. Maybe you might try to contact YesTimeToEdit who might give you a second oppinion on this one. He is more clued up when it comes to Uncyc games...
|Reviewer:||MrN 20:03, Feb 13|