Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Ggarfield/Complexity

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review
Revision as of 13:01, July 5, 2008 by LOLsupreme (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

edit Complexity

Oh dear, it's that time of the year again where you find someone like me who writes something big and complex in the hope that someone more zealous will go throw more links in my page, correct my grammar if necessary, and wikify because I'm lazy. Sure, I could do all that, but I should go do more writing instead. I'm gonna guess this is hit or miss here, but I bet the uncanny style of this article will bother many an old guarder and it will never make it to featuredom. However, if you find it funny, please help! Review away kind friends.

BlueflatcapsigMajor'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 18:20, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

I think it's optimistic,but not too much. --LOLsupreme 12:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Humour: 9.5 It's too cool,maybe not perfect but great jokes.You are very good.
Concept: 8 The complexity is cool,but some people may not get it.
Prose and formatting: 9 It's interesting and human readable,but short.
Images: 6 The chinese letters thing is great,the seasons images is good,the first is mysogin,and the other two are boring and indescidincifrable.
Miscellaneous: 9 It's a good article.
Final Score: 41.5 Make it longer.
Reviewer: --LOLsupreme 12:59, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects