Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopspedia

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


edit Uncyclopspedia

Never before seen except by some sinister admins. An innocent, small, quiet article turns into a disaster and crisis-How will it be saved!?!? By the way, the link in this doesnt work, here is the real link to the page User:Cloyster/Uncyclopspedia, Please review! (If you want to edit it and add your own stuff, I'd love it if you did that too) Cloyster 04:40, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Outhouse   Tagstit   doesn't believe in new fancy-pancy toilet systems with running water and all. Just a hole in the ground with a lil' cover will do. Now gimme' your article and I'll be done in a few minutes.

While you are welcome to review this, I suggest you find another article in need of help so that we can clear the ever growing Pee Request list.

Humour: 1 What is this? It is just a bunch of quotes. I am still very confused at what it even means. Is it supposed to be something about a Cyclops or a misspelling of Uncyclopedia? Well, there is no real humour here to review and most of your problem is in the concept. As far as I can see here though, you need to not rely on quotes so much. It is funny somethimes if you use them seldomly in an article if it works, but other than that don't rely on them. You should probably read HTBFANJS first.
Concept: 1 This is very, strange. Maybe it is a reference to something and I just don't get it, but it seems to me just a joke on misspelling. I STRONGLY recommend reading other featured articles to get an idea of what we are looking for on this site. For example, try reading Pawnography, Playstation 4, and my personal favorite, UnBooks:My New Life as a T-Rex. These are all great and varied examples of good humour on this site and brilliant ideas by some good writers. Try coming up with a new topic and write in a more encyclopedic style.
Prose and formatting: 2 There were no misspellings as far as I can see, but this is just all quotes, and that is not the right format for this site at all. Again, I recommend reading through some featured articles for some insight into HOW you should write. Also, you need headers and stuff like that. There is no real prose to review here because it isn't even in the right style and all I can recommend is that you read other examples of good articles to get an idea of what is considered good here.
Images: 0 There are no pictures. At the very least you should have at least a few. This improves the overall look and feel of any article.
Miscellaneous: 1 Averaged
Final Score: 5 This isn't the right style, its very random, and short, you need to get an idea of what is wanted here so you can make better articles for this site. If you have ANY questions just ask me on my talk page. I may have missed a reference to something and this good be really good in which case, I am sorry. Anyways just ask anything on my talk pageI will gladly help. Good luck!
Reviewer: ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 16:32, 29 January 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools