Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Uncyclopedia:Everything you ever wanted to know about Uncyclopedia, and weren't afraid to ask

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


edit Uncyclopedia:Everything you ever wanted to know about Uncyclopedia, and weren't afraid to ask

I haven't been here in a while, and I have really lost interest with the community, but I found this little article locked away and I realized someone could really make this good, so have fun with it. -- 02:03, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Forgot to sign in. --User:Doovad/sig 02:04, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

Humour: 4 Well, theres a lot of things in here that could be better. For starts you can try adding a few things that are a little bat fuck insane, or an example of one of our "in jokes." You could also try replacing some of the clearly directive answers with something that slightly leaves the reader baffled, but with a general idea of whats going on. A good example of that would be the response "Deleted." IMHO, I would have gone with something like "Devoured and digested into pellets of stenchy unworthiness by grues." Thats only a weak example, since I didn't have time to come up with something actually funny, but you get my idea.
Concept: 8 The concept is actually a rather good idea, something of an user created n00b guide. Although far from perfect in its initial form, I think this article can take the form of something quite humorous. That is, if it don't get consumed by the soul sucking force of the dementors first...
Prose and formatting: 6 I dont think the idea of trying to make the article into a 2 sided conversation between you and the reader is going anywhere happy... I'm not sure whatwould work best in this case, but try whatever feels right to you. Aside from that, very well formed, easy to read
Images: 3 This comment won't take too long to write, due to its simplicity: There is only one picture, and neither the picture, nor its caption are pleasurable.
Miscellaneous: 4 I felt the links did only a mediocre job of adding any extra humour into the article. The link for "in jokes" should have went to an actual page of an "in joke", such as Grueslayer. You could have also tryed to add a more entertaining stub to the top.
Final Score: 25 Finally, the end of your pain, and also the end of my malicious defamation Pee Review of your article. As a final note, I suggest that you totally rewrite your flaming mass of crap article and include a few original concepts, but done in a different way. On a side note, try to remember that this was mostly a serious review; I did not come in here looking for an article to flame, I simply imparted what my opinion was unto you. Also keep in mind that I am no veteran user in any way, still getting the hang of editing, and not just reading. Therefore, do not use only my opinion in your decision making process, ask your friends what you can do to improve. Finally, if you have any questions or comments, feel free to leave something on my talk page
Reviewer: --JeysisChrist

Comment. In passing, I just thought I'd mention I though it was quite amusing. It needs more pics, but the general gist of it is pretty good, and I'd say that for anyone who's spent a while on this site and knows the ins and outs a little more, it's a decent read. Just to give a bit of a counterpoint. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 20:34, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Personal tools