Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/UnTunes:Monkeys and Footballs

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review
Revision as of 22:51, July 5, 2008 by RAHB (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

edit UnTunes:Monkeys and Footballs

So.... I was pretttty bored today. I kept this recording pretty simple in case I have to re-record it. Thoughts? --Hyperbole 22:41, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

I AM PUTTING THIS TEXT HERE SO THAT NOBODY ELSE REVIEWS THIS WHILE I AM REVIEWING IT -RAHB 22:42, 5 July 2008 (UTC)

Humour: 9 I think the blend here is just perfect. The way it all fits in musically with itself is very well and good. Particularly, the way it starts out with an absurd concept, and then treats it throughout as though that original concept were normal, while saying the progressively more weird things about it. Even though, you know, the initial "monkey fucking a football" thing is the most absurd out of it all. I don't know how else to explain it, but the lyrics and timing for this all came together perfectly it seems. High praise for a short clip maybe, but I love it.
Concept: 7 Only a seven because the style itself has been used many a time before, but the lyrics and the topic and all were very good.
Prose and formatting: 10 I don't really see any problems here.
Images: 10 I think it compliments the tune and the writing itself very well.
Miscellaneous: 9 Averaged out the other scores.
Final Score: 45 I have to say again. You should think about writing a few more songs like this and getting a stand-up act together. You have the perfect voice for this style too, I read the lyrics beforehand, and when I listened I was very delighted to hear the voice I had imagined singing it, or close anyways. Seems you've got the audio and musical aspects well under control too, it's nice to have a clean sounding UnTune, though we do tend to have more of them than we used to nowadays, it's still refreshing to hear. Anyways, I hope that was what you were looking for. Pee Reviews are generally supposed to be a bit longer I guess, but I think in proportion to the article, and the fact that there's absolutely nothing about it that I would suggest changing, well, there you go.
Reviewer: RAHB 22:51, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects