Questionable article content and length leads me to be cautious and please know that the article isn't mine, It's Vanaelin's. --NXWave 23:55, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok, this is the first time I have pee-reviewed a UN-NEWS article, so my comments might be a bit off, forgive me if they are... I'm not a great fan of the Harry Potter series, but have seen some of the films... For me I did not really "Get" the joke. I liked the reference to the "dead poets" society, and think that there are probably some other subtle references in here which I missed. I'm not sure if that's a good thing as if I missed them then probably a lot of other people will also, and that's not going to make too many people laugh. I was refreshing to see a Wilde reference which was actually relevant for a change, but I'm afraid that if your thinking of putting this up for VFH it needs a few more "obvious" gags to get the punters laughing...
For me not the most original of ideas. The "Harry Potter is Gay" thing has been beaten to death for me, and I think this really just relies on that to keep it going.
Prose and formatting:
I can't find much wrong with your writing style. You obviously have a good grasp of language, and your formatting and layout work well. There are a few minor errors with the punctuation here and there maybe, but otherwise no problems..
The "Dead poets" pic was good, but I think you could have used the picture a bit better, and maybe made it a bit bigger. The pic of JK did not really add much in my view.
Like I said, I think your generally on dodgy ground here as this is not a new idea. There is some scope for expansion, but I think that you might have to come up with a new angle or concept to lift this above what people would be expecting when they first see the tittle. Like I say, perhaps there is more subtlety to the humour here, if there is that's cool, but I missed it, and I suspect others will also.