Please, only someone familiar with Walden review this.
Guildensternenstein 05:17, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
Humour:
9
Although it's only at the peak of its humour if you are familiar with Walden, even without prior knowing, this article is quite funny.
Concept:
7
The article works very well, the concept has been used before but I've not read any other similar article as funny as this one.
Prose and formatting:
7
Some grammar errors in this, I'd correct them but I'm too busy clearing this backlog of reviews.
Images:
8
Images work very well, the mushroom caption made me laugh my arse off.
Miscellaneous:
8
A good article overall, it could do with improvements in the grammar department but that is all I'd change
Final Score:
39
Don't change the content, it works as well as I can see it working, not many people will be familiar with Walden which is why it has probably been here waiting for a review. My favourite part is in the first paragraphs when it refers back to the repetative narritive.
For the record most of those grammatical errors (like the run-on sentences) are intentional, as that's how Thoreau writes. It's really quite painful, actually. Thanks for the review, though! --Guildensternenstein 04:17, 25 February 2009 (UTC).
thats not the ones I was pointing out, I meant actualy grammatical errors.--Projectmayhem666Talk 07:43, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
