Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Solvent (2nd review and minor rewrite)
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
silicson 22:00, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
On face value decent article. Formatting issues: yes. Please remove the Oscar Wilde quote...seriously. I'll finish reading it later b/c you did a good job at pulling me in with the introductory paragraph.Projectjulio 20:08, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
Your review has been removed, because your accuracy is 0, meaning if
I we're to hit with my piss-stream a woman's ass hole, I would fill her entire colon.
You would just be giving her a warm bath. And I would slap you. And so would she. --silicson 18:58, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
edit Fair enough.
If you want another review, you're certainly welcome to one (whenever someone else gets around to doing it). By deleting the review, you've put this back into the "not reviewed" pool, so I'll restore the template.
Future reviewers might be interested in the diff for my original review: . 22:33, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
They also might be interested in looking at Sycamore's review, as he obviously disagreed with my assessment of the article. 22:43, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
|Humour:||2.5||I'm being more generous than Hyperbole was here, because I love the comedy created by your non-stop awful prose. For a more detailed account of what I think, refer to Hyperbole's review.|
|Concept:||1||I am confused.|
|Prose and formatting:||1||I am pleased to report that the majority of the humour in this article comes from its bizarre, disjointed and indecipherable English. An article with a coherent concept written in this style has the potential to be hilarious, but as I described above, I have no idea what you are talking about.|
|Images:||2||Completely irrelevant, but to what: who knows?|
|Miscellaneous:||0.7||I awarded one tenth of a point for each kilobyte of server space this article takes up.|
|Reviewer:||IronLung 22:02, 18 February 2009 (UTC)|
That's it!I'm rewriting it! --silicson 17:28, 19 February 2009 (UTC)