From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
silicson 01:32, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
For a bumming session with Noel Fielding
|Humour:||6||Reasonbly good here, I did not find the idea or the contnet to to be far off - The formating and structure is a little though.
|Concept:||6.5||Difficult one to work - any topic can be funny, it's a question of the angle you go from. Here I think some history parodies are very possible. I quite like the way the film Fight Club plays around with chemestry - you could mayeb have a diverse range of uses covered by experts etc. It's all about time and coherency - i think that it requires more work but it is soemthing that could work quite well.|
|Prose and formatting:||6||Rough cut, sometimes you don't space words or comas or misuse of CAPS which looks bad. Some sections seem to go off in a tangent like "Fast Sucksesion" Also some words that do not exist "Idiap"? I could nt pick for a while - ususlay the bulk of these issuies seem to dies down a fair bit once you have got down what you are trying to say. I have a feeling that you might need to ind that still with this.
Images per say should be space thorughout an article not just the bottom, I usually advise aliging right and keeping them at an equal distance throughout the article. It looks pretty ugly, I also have thema little bit bigger than wikipedia articles, as our purpose is to be funny and to amuse - so a greater emphaiss is on impact.
|Images:||6.5||Nothing looked to bad here - nothig special, many of the captions seem a little random again as well as the relevence of some of the images. I feel that greater work on the content and formatting will allow for changes here - I advise that you spend time on that and then worry more about images.|
|Miscellaneous:||6.5||Intailly - needs a bit of time and a more polish. Random humour tends to work less well - its better to have a coherhent parody throughout an article. We've got a page on how to do this well here. Again good stuff does not overnight but usually requires a little time to get to be really funny.|
|Final Score:||31.5||I hope I've been able to help if theres anything, do not hesitate to contact me on my talkpage:)|
|Reviewer:||— Sir Sycamore (talk) 18:59, 1 January 2009 (UTC)|