Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Scat II

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ


edit Scat

Dudes and dudettes. This is, like, not my page, but some dude in a forum thought it would be gnarly if someone cool could be a bud and make a pee review for a page that was, like, problematic and ant-eye-social. Could open your eyes and be, uh, reading it, 'n' stuff? That'd be great. Later, dude. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 20:31, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

  • What he said. I'm some dude. Spikebrennan 21:50, 24 April 2008 (UTC)


Aubergine

Behold! A flowering perennial of most becoming prodigious-ity has taken root. Sensitive sinus sufferers beware: this article is under the green thumb of

Mightydandylion!

I'm look forward to this, hahaha! Mightydandylion Icons-flag-us (talk) Fk 16:31, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Humour: 8.5 Note 1. “Scat dwee-oo dwee oo’n doo wa dwee-oo dwee oo’n doowa skittle dee dee ‘n dee. Ba bee ba da doo’n dee da’n doo da, zoo za zoo zee zee zoo zee zee zee za. Skittle n’diddle n’fiddle dee dee’n’dee. Baaaa bwee doo’n doo-wa ooby dooby doo-wa be-doo wa wa shooby dooby doo: mee mee ma may moo moo.” Jive man. Very cool. I kept smiling throughout this passage. Kudos!

Note 2. “Mairzy Doats” I don’t know why but I keep laughing at that heading.

Note 3. “Bah bah doo da boo, boop boop de boop. Boop. A kiddley divey too. [1] Chibaba, chibaba, chiwawa. Enjalawa cookala goomba. Zippety doo dah shoorah shoorah.” Let me disclose my secret. I’m reading this whole article aloud. And I’ve got to say: it’s fun!

Note 4. The Hi-de-hi-de-hi-de-hi/Hi-de-hi-de-hi-de-hi dichotomy. WHY DO I KEEP SMILING?!? CEASE TORMENTOR! :)

Note 5. Shoobee doo wop wop section. Very good section. Still smiling. I was reading the discussion page of this article and you mentioned how these scats are actually gleaned from real-life popular scats. I was wondering if you would be so kind to put up a sort of guide in the discussion page that could aid the reader in identifying such scats and which songs/artists they allude to. It’d be really cool treat for the reader. Also, the footnotes are fun. Also, The mow mow-Mao redirect made me laugh.

Note 6. Ooh wee chirpy chirpy cheep cheepwee chirpy chirpy cheep cheep section. Still smiling; but I realized something: I was really apprehensive of reading this section because of it’s imposing size compared to the other sections. The section’s daunting-ness caused my smiling hitherto to falter. For an idea like this, may one suggest breaking up large blocks of scat into more manageable piles. That would allay the reader’s initial apprehension of being lost in what appears to be a mass of inscrutable text.

Note 7. "Tom bo li de say de moi ya, Yeah, Jambo Jumbo. Menememenenemeee, deduuduuduu dedaadaadaa, mammasay mammasah mama-koosah. Chicka chickaa, oh yeah." I’ve no idea why but this passage did not elicit any smirks, smiles, or lols.

Note 8. Bum stiggedy bum stiggedy bum section. Great heading. Elicited a snicker. The section largely was difficult to read. Coupled with the aforementioned concerns of point 6, this part also did not flow particularly well. Still, “My, my, my, my” and “A mulatto, an albino a mosquito, my libido.” were absolutely great. I laughed.

Note 9. “"Bawitaba da bang da dang diggy diggy" said the boogie. Said up jump the boogie” Excellent. Elicited a laugh. However, the rest of the section elicited no smirks, smiles, or lols. “Izzle kizzle, fo' schizzle my nizzle, what you sizzle? Fo' schizzle bizzle, ha ha.” is uninspired.

Note 10. “Na na na na, na na na na, hey hey[4].” Almost missed this one! Good job! Elicited much appreciation and a smile. Once again, good footnotes!

Note 11. While not loling throughout, the effect upon the reader of this article may be likened to the refreshing and restorative properties of a Sunday morning’s walk down a gentrified neighborhood-—with a flower in hand. Dig?

Concept: 9 Excellent concept. Scat, baby.
Prose and formatting: 7 The prose? Well, please look at note 6. and note 8.. Other than that, the prose was fully within expectant Uncyclopedia standards on scat. The formatting could use a touchup. It's lacking a certain ooh e ooh ah ah wing wang wallla walla bing bang. Can one make scat prettier?
Images: 8 The first and fourth pictures were fine. The second and third were brilliant and clever. I am especially appreciative of the rama lama ding dong captioning. Excellent.
Miscellaneous: 8.1 Averaged.
Final Score: 40.6 The article’s execution of this very difficult concept evidences a thoughtful and jiving mind. Good job! Just work on the aforementioned elements that need be worked upon and surely, this article will be a-hoppin’ and a-skippin’ in the VFH spotlight. Good luck and Godspeed.
Reviewer: Mightydandylion Icons-flag-us (talk) Fk 18:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects