Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Robert Fripp

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (11}}|0|{{#ifeq:{{#rpos:{{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|11}}|(}}|-1||{{#rpos:{{#sub:{{PAGENAME}}|11}}|(}}}}}})
Line 8: Line 8:
   
 
{{Pee Review Table
 
{{Pee Review Table
|Hscore=
+
|Hscore= 7
|Hcomment=
+
|Hcomment= Haven't heard of Robert Fripp so I don't get any satire that is being applied. Use a {{Wikipedia}} in your article. However still funny.
|Cscore=
+
|Cscore= 8
|Ccomment=
+
|Ccomment= You know your stuff. Good content. Relevant.
|Pscore=
+
|Pscore= 7
|Pcomment=
+
|Pcomment= Don't go to far into story telling but still good.
|Iscore=
+
|Iscore= 7
|Icomment=
+
|Icomment= Decent imagery. Try to make the captions even funnier.
|Mscore=
+
|Mscore= {{pee|7|8|7|7}}
|Mcomment=
+
|Mcomment= Average Score
|Fcomment=
+
|Fcomment= Great work. Keep making articles.
|Signature=
+
|Signature= {{User:ScottPat/sig}} 18:33, April 5, 2013 (UTC)
 
}}
 
}}
   

Revision as of 18:33, April 5, 2013

FAQ

Robert Fripp

Started it a little while ago. Tell me what you think of it. --Murder Frog Dull interest wanes. 16:11, December 27, 2012 (UTC)

Humour: 7 Haven't heard of Robert Fripp so I don't get any satire that is being applied. Use a
Bouncywikilogo6
For the religious among us who choose to believe lies, the self-proclaimed experts at Wikipedia have an article about Pee Review/Robert Fripp.
in your article. However still funny.
Concept: 8 You know your stuff. Good content. Relevant.
Prose and formatting: 7 Don't go to far into story telling but still good.
Images: 7 Decent imagery. Try to make the captions even funnier.
Miscellaneous: 7.3 Average Score
Final Score: 36.3 Great work. Keep making articles.
Reviewer: Sir ScottPat Icons-flag-gb Scotland Flag 1 UnS CUN VFH (talk) 18:33, April 5, 2013 (UTC)

</div>

Personal tools
projects