Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Prison Break
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
It occurs to me that it would be useful if this were reviewed either by someone who's never seen Prison Break or someone who has. So, if you've neither never seen Prison Break or have never not seen Prison Break, please don't review this.01:28, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
- Hey, it's me. Yeah, I've done nothing for a while, so I'll do this. And this time I mean it. BlueYonder - CONTACT
- I'm starting to think you don't mean it. Anyone? 23:12, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
|Humour:||9||I actually laughed. The introduction was great. Just enough to get you hooked on the rest of the article.
Blatant narration of bad acting....eh.... it's one of those things that technically should have made me laugh, but it didn't. I think that the scripts need more work. The rest is pretty good.
No, references to Pedophilia are bad humor. It doesn't work, and should never be used. Like, ever.
Sex jokes aren't that great either, with the scene between Teabag and Gretchen. That is kind of dumb. Maybe it's just because I'm single.
I like the recurring themes section. That was great.
|Concept:||8||The concept of Prison Break being renamed "People Pointing Guns at Each Other" is good. I think Wikipedia may have an article on it, too. Overall, the setup is very adequate.|
|Prose and formatting:||10||Well articulated, put-together, and not ugly at all. Kudos to you!|
|Images:||7||They fit the theme, but the images themselves aren't neccesarily funny, except for the Fox public advertisement. That was okay, humor-wise. Maybe more spoof images like that,|
|Miscellaneous:||8.5||That's the average of the scores.|
|Final Score:||42.5||I haven't even seen Prison Break, and I laughed quite a bit at the article. It's overall very good. I liked it.|
|Reviewer:||MaxPayne 14:34, 22 April 2009 (UTC)|