This is the third review request made for this article in 2009. Although I was quite happy with the response I received from the last one, it was by no means the end of my ambition to make the article even better. -- The Colonel(talk) 02:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Edit: Apparently, the lack of excellent images is till a major problem with this article, but I don't really think it's something I am going to fuss about at the moment. -- The Colonel(talk) 02:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Humour:
6
Could do with a few more jokes in here, Pentiums known for their exploding and burning people alive type stuff to add to the humour.
Concept:
7
It's similar to the article on Microsoft but I'm going to let it pass because I don't like that author and this article is funnier.
Prose and formatting:
8
Grammar and spelling is fine, no complaints. Article structure however, it looks bad, could do with neatening.
Images:
6
The images could do with improving, images and captions aren't that funny but at least they fit
Miscellaneous:
7
Good article, room for improvement though, has potential.
Final Score:
34
Hope to see this up for a 4th time, maybe next time I'll nominate it for VFH.
