This is the third review request made for this article in 2009. Although I was quite happy with the response I received from the last one, it was by no means the end of my ambition to make the article even better. -- The Colonel(talk) 02:32, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Edit: Apparently, the lack of excellent images is till a major problem with this article, but I don't really think it's something I am going to fuss about at the moment. -- The Colonel(talk) 02:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)
Could do with a few more jokes in here, Pentiums known for their exploding and burning people alive type stuff to add to the humour.
It's similar to the article on Microsoft but I'm going to let it pass because I don't like that author and this article is funnier.
Prose and formatting:
Grammar and spelling is fine, no complaints. Article structure however, it looks bad, could do with neatening.
The images could do with improving, images and captions aren't that funny but at least they fit
Good article, room for improvement though, has potential.
Hope to see this up for a 4th time, maybe next time I'll nominate it for VFH.