Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Meaning

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

edit Meaning

Up for a fourth review. Fourth reviews have to be done with care, because I've basically heard everything about this. In other words, I, and everybody else who puts an article up on Pee Review, want an in-depth review from you fuckers! I'm a REVIEW NAZI!   Le Cejak <-> (Dec 18 / 14:51)

Revue de Pierre - we take the pee out of pee review and replace it with Pierre

This article is being reviewed by Le Marquis de Nofu. It is amazing that the aristocracy has time for this piss Pierre!

--BlueflatcapsigMajor'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 17:12, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 8.5 The breakdown!
  1. Intro(7): You need an intro that follows the encyclopedic style. Perhaps some historical note, a phony root for the word, some added rambling, etc. I think the would make this part funnier. Other than that, the jokes here are good. Finally, the odd formatting here annoys me more than anything, even though it is amusing. You might want to throw in a quote to offset the first part, as it is just too much weirdness too close to the top.
  1. Meaning(first and second) - (7.2): OMG, this is soooo hot. Jesus, it's amazing! Oh sorry, I was looking at pictures of Emily Browning again...anyway, Although this shit is funny, I can't find it in my heart to give it more than seven. I don't recommend expanding it, however. Format it more creatively, and you might get away with it.
  1. Meaning (3rd)- (8.5):This is pretty dang funny, but I am sick of potty humor. Something funnier like erections or rapid instantaneous weight loss would have amused me more. I did like the imploding heart, but having jumped off the cliff would have been just as good. The gay it is very funny.
  1. Meaning(???) - (10): I give you 10 because the text that is barely visible unless you highlight it was clever. The content here is also great. Don't change a mother huffing thing.
  1. Meaning(the rest) - (-9.997643 * -1): That thing about winks is utter brilliance. It is like Jesus Casanova or sex with Emily Browning on Christmas good. Other than that, Nods rock, Glances glimmer, nipple rubbing = haha, nudges are fine, w/e! That whole last section is the best part so I give you high score. I'm going to go findy Emily browning now and try to rub her nipples. Why not?
Concept: 10 I am not one to complain about concepts like this. This is good.
Prose and formatting: 10 Well, randomness cat was amused by this article until he realized the author knows wtf he's doing. When randomness cat realized the pointlessness had a point, he promptly went into a coma. You will be sent the bill.
Images: 5.2 NO! If you are going to use the same picture again and again, I want stuff to be going on in the picture. E.g.: there is a hat on this dude that changes every time, or people have sex in the background, or a bear sneaking up behind him, or a knife fight, or a parked car. You get the picture. It is a must that something funny is going on b/c that picture gets predictable, which is only funny until the third time you see it. BTW, is that Teddy Roosevelt's fuckin' face? Is it? Really? Could it be!?!?!111!!11!!!!
Miscellaneous: 9.1 You earn this for making scrabble so huffing funny.
Final Score: 42.8 Emily browning rocks. Fix the image. Your article is very good, but that first section could do with a tweaking. I love the scrabble jokes. You might want to consider changing some of that odd banter about scrabble into back-and-forth user and wise dude nonsense. Just a thought. I imagine we'll be seeing this on VFH soon?
Reviewer: --BlueflatcapsigMajor'GUN' Ggarfield, Le Marquis de Nofu .Complex! 17:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)


Ahh, balls. Stick with the Indian cajek, maybe tweak the text a bit.  ;) :P

Nice review Ggarfield, good to see your putting lots of effort into the process. MrN Icons-flag-gb HalIcon.png WhoreMrn.png Fork you! 20:10, Dec 19

Personal tools
projects