I'm not sure how we can possibly review this. I mean, technically it's not a comedy article at all. As far as I can tell, it's dead serious. It's something stupid that a fundamentalist wrote, which has been cut-and-pasted onto Uncyclopedia so we can laugh at it. Am I wrong about any of that?
So... what purpose would a review serve? Would we e-mail the fundie suggestions about how to make himself look even dumber? Or are you looking for advice on whether you should alter his article (beyond formatting, linkage, etc.)? Well... probably not, since that would kill the joke, which is "Whoa, look at this moron."
Honestly, since this isn't really original work, I'm not sure it belongs on Uncyclopedia at all. This is the kind of thing that seems better suited for ED. Uncyclopedia is more about "hey, let me tell you a joke I just wrote," where ED is more like "lol look at these morons!!"