Very poor. This article is rife with one liners and is so devoid of humourous content, it puts a blank piece of paper to shame. Some of the article depends on internet memes ("a sploded"), which not only are old anyway, but the memes itself are overused in the article. Other parts are just so random, it's unfunny. The only worthy stints of humour is the excess of images and just maybe the way how the style of writing reminds me of a pyromaniac obsessed with jet engines and the author argues that there are no disadvantages to the superior jet engine.
The idea of jet engines being some sort of flatuence gears towards randomness rather than the more necessary funny.
Prose and formatting:
Badly arranged, the article reminds me of my shopping list, except maybe for the lack of food and containment of jet engines. The vocabulary is, like, whatever. Add more compacency to the words, and perhaps, add some more words too.
Perhaps the only credible part, although it's only due to the abundance of images to comply with the list, sorry, length of the article.
Failed attempt to nominate the article. I presume it was a self-nom, quite literally.
I don't like beng harsh to others on Uncyclopedia, but please give it a think through before hitting the edit button next time. There are worse articles, but it is still very poor.