Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/I don't know (Take 1.5)
From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
It's been half re-rewritten, added some stuff about the handy dandy edit buttons that no one uses. Hoping that someone other than AE reviews it as much as I love him as a reviewer, I'd love to have a fresh opinion of this.
|Humour:||5||Jason shooting the author was a bit random. Why not have the author run into a wall with regards to wiki formatting and end up fucking the article up in a very amusing manner? I think that might be a good ending.
You can take this criticism or not, but the "Chink" caption on the first image I thought was out of line. Used tastefully (and I can't believe I'm going to finish this sentence), racism and ethnic slurs can be funny, but this one is just too out of context to be perceived as anything but stupid.
Truth be told, I found the rest of the article to be hilarious, but those two moments brought it down. The second one especially. I suffer from liberal guilt, I know.
|Concept:||7||Not the most original of articles - I've seen many articles around written in the first person and sort of... stream of consciousness I guess is the style I'm looking for here. That being said, it is still a very good example of this variety of article.|
|Prose and formatting:||8||Solid yet conventional wiki article formatting. See my comment above: I think a first time article writer with no experience should fuck the article up with humorous (but still legible) results.|
|Images:||7||I've got to give you props for the Gonzales picture and caption, but I thought the first image was lacking. Two total images does seem like a good number to have for this length of article.|
|Miscellaneous:||9||I would like to use this section to comment on length. I thought this article was a great length. It didn't wear out its welcome, but it was around long enough to milk just about all the humor I think you could milk out of the concept of a first time editor's pathetic attempt at writing an article. So you get points there.|
|Final Score:||36||Article well written, funny, etc. Very good overall. I've said everything else I can think of above.|
|Reviewer:||Gage 06:41, 13 February 2008 (UTC)|