Humour-wise this had me in utter hysterics pretty much all the way through, the repetativeness of the article really makes this work, everything follow the theme images and all, its a riot. However what I do have to say about this is that it is a stub, it's only 4 lines of text (I have a high resolution monitor it could be more on your screen). Because its so short, as funny as it is I don't think it could go on to VFH. It could perhaps do with some expansion in the sections to make alot more people like it, however, I already like it as it is and give this a straight 9 regardless of stubbyness.
Concept and implentation is perfect, the idea is great, repeating the sections to represent both the repetative music as well as the concept of repeating yourself in order to write the song is brilliant. Its hard to write a long review here as the article is so short but as you can tell I really like it.
Prose and formatting:
Over use of the Oxford comma, its something I personally don't like, I understand that you do, but its my review. In the second section you've used "listener's" and there is no need for an apostrophe here, even if it was a collective pluralisation (its not really but hey) the apostrophe would be after the s. The third section could be better "you should go to another slightly different version of your original motif,". That really does not sound right. I've given a low score even though there's only a few mistakes because there isn't alot to make a mistake on if you get me.
Images work really well however you should add one for the end of the song that is different to the other two to keep the theme running. Captions and images work very well
This article has done something great and original, so that little je ne sais quoi that this section is for gets a 10 from me.
I love this article didn't half make me laugh, good work.