Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/HowTo:Write Good (reworked)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review
Revision as of 06:23, February 26, 2009 by Guildensternenstein (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

edit HowTo:Write Good

After a very helpful review from a total boob, I have reworked it a little bit and am resubmitting, if anyone cares.

TPLN 00:22, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Ahhhaha...I get it...because Tit...funny ~SirTagstitVFHNotMPEEINGCPTRotMBFF 01:09, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
No, it isn't funny. I hate stuff that isn't funny. I'm going to eat a worm. --TPLN 01:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Humour: 10 Fan-fucking-tastic. I laughed out loud several times, which is problematic because it's 1:20AM and my roommate is asleep. The wonderfully bad advice, the "English jokes," the "it was a dark..." beginning, and the similies. Brilliant. Fucking brilliant.
Concept: 10 Fucking brilliant.
Prose and formatting: 9 You write "writed" instead of "written" at one point, though I'm fairly certain this is intentional. Bad joke alert: you write good! A-ha, a-ha, a-ha. *slaps knee*
Images: 7 Two good, appropriate images. Fittingly, this is a text-driven article, and doesn't need too many images. Perhaps try finding one more, to break up the rather texty middle just a bit.
Miscellaneous: 10 Love it.
Final Score: 46 This article is like candy dreams...in space.
Reviewer: --Guildensternenstein 06:23, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects