Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/China's Retard Extermination Policy (a little (quick)ly, if you would please.)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review
Revision as of 18:40, December 15, 2008 by 70.179.185.102 (talk)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

edit Retard Extermination Policy

So anyway, this is supposed to parody the One-Child Policy, where a foreign diplomat intervenes with the original plans and lets the leaders of China know that to prune out the intellectually defective for the good of the country is a far more effective method of population growth control than to indiscriminately abort babies, some of whom could've gone on to have an IQ of 125+. Is this a load of CREP!? You decide! 70.179.185.102 01:39, 20 November 2008 (UTC)

Humour: 2 Low-to-Medium-grade humour, some smiles, but only a few laughs.
Concept: 6 This is a highly conceptual work, but a paroidy of the One-Child Policy in China works if you have more concept you put in.
Prose and formatting: 5 Gave five for several reasons. One is that the idea of exterminating retards in China sounds good, but to the UN, it is not. Secondly, it is very prose in style, but not much prose and Formatting put in place.
Images: 4 This complies with the HTBFANJS rules. Add lots of images. Well, these images aren't even relevent!
Miscellaneous: 4 This is discriminating the intellectually disabled.
Final Score: 21 This is a load of CREP. Seriously, spend some more time reorganising the work and add more humour, preferably the toilet humour, such as "Retards have diarrhoea, according to the Chinese".
Reviewer: GiratinaOriginForme |Si Plebius Dato' (Sir) Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill 800px-Flag of the Philippines svg | 08:15, 22 November 2008 (UTC)


edit Alternate opinion, maybe

In my opinion, the article was much better than a 2. I would've put it at 6 or so, because I think it's a bit dry and needs a few sly quips thrown in, and a more conclusive ending would also be nice. Personally, I found this to be far from crap, and I don't think toilet humor is the right direction for this article...but that's just me, of course. Satire the Chinese officials rather than the targets of their scheme to avoid seeming cruel, and give it a shot. Good luck, - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon Baloon(Tick Tock) (Contribs) 19:28, Nov 22

Personal tools
projects