Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Cartilage

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

< Uncyclopedia:Pee Review
Revision as of 23:26, December 3, 2012 by Ratfactor (talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

FAQ

edit Cartilage

Uncyclomasters: I am a noob and I have written an article. May it please you. Or not. Help me see all of my flaws so I have a reason to finally put that toaster in the bathtub tonight.

Ratfactor (talk) 22:15, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

Wow, thanks for the review Simsilikesims!  - Ratfactor talk 23:26, December 3, 2012 (UTC)
Humour: 9 This article was featured for several very good reasons. Lots of fun silliness here, a bit of innuendo (who would have thought cartilage could be seductive), and the silliness is properly dispersed throughout the entire article, it doesn't stop after the first section as is so common elsewhere.
Concept: 8 This is a mostly original concept of using anatomy to be funny (but not the usual parts of anatomy that are usually made fun of) and brilliantly fleshed out.
Prose and formatting: 10 No formatting flaws, and this article seems well written.
Images: 10 The images are related to things that really do have cartilage in them, such as ears, and sharks. The captions are even better, which is hard to do given these quality images.
Miscellaneous: 8.8 Feature! As you should be able to tell from the fact that this article was one of the first featured without a proper pee review. Maybe I was influenced by that fact, but I enjoyed it just the same, and more than some features that I've read.
Final Score: 45.8 Well written, funny, well formatted, great images. What isn't to like?
Reviewer: -- Simsilikesims(♀UN) Talk here. 17:03, December 1, 2012 (UTC)
Personal tools
projects