Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Budget deficit

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


edit Budget deficit

Yep yep. --Hotadmin4u69 [TALK] 05:27, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

Budget deficit
is being reviewed by
Your Source for Fine Scented Pee
And Whatever Else Comes Out Of Him

Be back in a li'l bit   Le Cejak <-> (Dec 26 / 16:18)

Humour: 6.8 avg of each section...
  • Intro [8]

Above average intro. Made me smile.

  • 1 How it works [6]

I'm not sure this section makes it. Maybe it's too confusing... Maybe I'm just teh stoopids.

  • 1.1 Cutting spending [7]

Hmmm... That thing about building bridges to nowhere is good. Maybe expand on stupid projects the government is wasting money on?

  • 2 Deficit vs balanced budget [6]

Again, I don't know about this section. I'm a liberal. Not only that, I'm a liberal policy wonk, and I got the jokes. However, I think you should (and I hate saying this because I love liberal propaganda) ease up on the liberal propaganda. You should probably, like HTBFANJS says, take something serious and make it retarded (I just finished reading HTBFANJS). This topic feels so serious to me that I feel like you should probably just go all out. Especially in this section.

  • 3 How to determine it [7]

Wow, well I have to say that that's an okay ending to this article.

Concept: 7 I gave you an "adequate" because this article could go in many different directions. I voted Symbol for vote For. the United Nations Charter article not only because I refuse to vote Symbol against vote Against. on VFH (and not only because I vote for on everything I review, and not only because it was good) but because you took something serious and made it interesting to read. Obviously you're doing that again here (and I didn't realize until it was too late that I'm reviewing another one of your articles). I think this is a worthy topic to write on, but I don't think you know what to do with it. Probably you should go on and on about useless government programs (LIKE THE BRIDGE TO ALASKA!). That's all I got.
Prose and formatting: 5 I really hated the dominance of those two useless pictures and the giant red letters at the bottom. Why is Greenspan all the way over there?
Images: 5 I think those pictures are useless and not very funny, really. They don't add anything!
Miscellaneous: 6 {{Pee|6.8|7|5|5}}
Final Score: 29.8 I think it's fairly obvious why your score is so low, EMC. Those pictures, the formatting, and sections 1.0 and 2. Hope I helped!
Reviewer:   Le Cejak <-> (Dec 26 / 16:55)
Personal tools