Taken a second look, does anyone want to add to these two reviews? I'm a newer user, so my scores may not match the views of this site... Le Man de Jump OhOne 19:03, April 25, 2010 (UTC)
Submitted on behalf of InMooseWeTrust who would like someone to take a second look. --ChiefjusticeDS 17:59, April 11, 2010 (UTC)
Come on, no one wants to pee review this? InMooseWeTrust 20:15, April 16, 2010 (UTC)
I'll try this. ~ 08:20, Apr 25, 2010
Sorry, lost my reviewing muse. Somebody else please take this. ~ 13:02, Apr 25, 2010
The article was very witty and clever, especially within the presidency part. However, you did repeat on the alcohol joke a bit much. It worked out okay in this smaller article - and I understand Yeltsin was a heavy drinker - but if the article was any longer I might have lost my patience with it. Make your jokes a tad bit more varied next time, and I will give it a ten.
Again, this relates to the redundancy of the alcohol joke. It was funny portraying Yeltsin as "the only president with a lower approval rating than alcohol level", but again, make sure your jokes are slightly more varied.
Prose and formatting:
You had this weird issue with the formatting on the Presidency section, where the words nearly overlapped with the pictures, but this might be a flaw with the Wikipedia formatting in general, so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt. Other than that, the article was very well done grammar-wise, and it even appeared you gave it a nice spellcheck before you finished. This part was very good.
It appeared that you got most of your images off the web and added captions to them. While most people (including me) do this, edit a few more images. The captions were still very good, though.
Your average score, it appears that it is right where it should be. Very good.
This article was very good, just remember in the future that you should vary your jokes a little.