Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Black (Video Game)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search


edit Black (Video Game)

Hey! I created this article very shortly, if anyone would like to reveiw it please...? Also, Black is an actual game, and please mention if you have played it so I can verify your understanding of the subject. And suggest changes too, don't just tell me what's wrong with it because I know it's plagued with problems. It is a work in progress, after all. Thanx!! --Andy the Idiot 01:19, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

PRE-REVIEW: Ah, I've never heard of the game. Even before I've seen the article I know there's a big chance I'm not going to get it. This reminds me of a page I did on an obscure kids show. I learned a lot on how to make a page funny even if you have never heard of it.

  • It helps to enlist other people who have played the game. This is basically mandatory.
  • It helps to make it over the top as opposed to being subtle. Subtlety only works when people understand the subject. However, don't let the sarcasm take over. Articles that are only sarcasm get old real fast.
  • It helps to explain the thing at the very start. Remember, go overboard on sarcasm.

OKAY! I'M DONE! SOUNDS LIKE A PLAN! (NOTE: I usually do not go into this much detail, but for you I will.) --  Le Cejak <-> 02:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 6 Nice! You followed my sarcasm advice before I even said it!
    • The gameplay involved(INVOLVES) holding down the trigger of a weapon for ages before realising that you're not shooting at anything.
    • ...your character (whose name is never fully implemented)...
    • if I had to purchase either Black or Ghost Recon Advanced Warfighter, I would buy Crazy Frog Racer.
    • when your hanging around with the Pope it's probably not a good idea to play Black.
  • oy!:
    • You go on too long explaining what the AI does. Here, sarcasm gets old. Holy crap, you mentioned Kim Possible... I'm gonna mention this game in the article, then.
    • "Here are EA's official answers (notice how some questiosn are answered with a question. This makes many rabbis mad.)" Randomness, bad spelling, not cool. I notice that the second half of the article has A LOT of spelling mistakes.
    • The entire Q & A section should go. It's just random.
  • Oh, come on, add the trivia section into the main article somehow! Don't be lazy!
  • MAKE IT LONGER. That's the main reason I lowered it to a 6.
Concept: 7.44 This is an average of all the "concept" scores I got for Kim Possible, plus my own, a 6, because this article is as good as that one except it is lacking one thing: a direction. In the KP article, there's an explanation of the story. You are at a serious disadvantage because this isn't a series, and therefore too short to explain anything. MERGE THE TRIVIA SECTION.
Prose and formatting: 8.5 Find all the spelling and grammar mistakes, and you'll do fine. MERGE THE TRIVIA SECTION.
Images: 7 I like it. Put it in the article somewhere and make it smaller. I'm glad that the article doesn't have a lot of images.
Final Score: 35.94 Whew, that took a while. Here's what I think: every article could become VFH, because there's always a chance that Dane Cook has an account on here. However, some articles will take a long time to get there. This is one of those articles. ...Please, please tell me if it helped or not.
Reviewer:   Le Cejak <-> 02:29, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools