I don't expect a grade higher than 20. --Nordamus (blab • crap) 03:17, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
||This wasn't ridiculously funny, but it was a good read. I liked the mention of a shotgun included in the list of birdwatching supplies.
||Birdwatching is a pretty lame thing to have as a pastime, and I think you do a good job of conveying that. I thought bringing up PETA was funny.
|Prose and formatting:
||Do you think the bird would look better on the other side of the article?
||Nothing really notable in this regard. Your image didn't detract from your article, but it didn't really add much to the humor. The caption, I suppose, might be funnier.
||The Oscar Wildeism didn't really do it for me. Nor did the George Bush mention. They seem more random than clever to me and they distract from what is otherwise a pretty well unified article.
||I'm new to reviewing, so maybe my score isn't that accurate? I don't know. It was a pretty good article. It was less random and more focused than many articles, which I like.
||--GodShapedBullet 03:33, 2 September 2007 (UTC)