Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Aldrich Ames

Main Current Reviewed Archived Guidelines FAQ Committee RotM

Aldrich Ames

Humour:	5	Wasn't that good. I got bored. It could have been so much better.
Concept:	5	The concept you used was good, but you rushed it too much.
Prose and formatting:	5	Many spelling errors. You could fix the red links to link somewhere.
Images:	5	You had the same image twice. What's the point in that?
Miscellaneous:	5	Fix it, dude.
Final Score:	25	I'll give it 5 out of 10. Write it again.
Reviewer:	Finntastic 10:25, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Finntastic didn't give it any scores. It has to get scores to be taken off pee review to the "reviewed" page, so I've put in 5's because that's what the reviewer gave the article as a whole. My own comments: try to make your humour less random. Putting together a lot of random facts is overused on Uncyclopedia, and so people get tired of it easily. Try to make the ideas related to each other rather than just listing "1000 years ago" "Chuck Norris" "divorced her 3 hours later." etc. What you might do is write something funny about how this CIA agent sold secrets to the Russians - relate the article more to Mr. Ames' life than just listing random ideas. Sir Roger 06:05, 9 June 2007 (UTC)